Barry Pennan M, Scott Katherine C, McCright Jacqueline, Snell Ameera, Lee Monica, Bascom Trish, Kent Charlotte K, Klausner Jeffrey D
Epidemic Intelligence Service, Office of Workforce and Career Development, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Sex Transm Dis. 2008 Jun;35(6):550-2. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31816a43d3.
To provide chlamydia and gonorrhea screening and treatment to adolescents presumed to be at high risk, school screening was conducted among the 11th and 12th graders in San Francisco.
Two schools in neighborhoods with high chlamydia and gonorrhea rates and student populations > or = 15% black were chosen. Students viewed a 10-minute presentation and received test kits. Students decided in a private bathroom stall whether to test. All students were encouraged to return a test kit (whether they returned a urine specimen).
Of 967 eligible students, 853 (88%) were in attendance. Of these, 21 (2%) declined to participate and 537 (63%) returned a specimen for testing. Students who tested were predominately heterosexual (93%) and nonwhite (99%). No students tested positive for gonorrhea; 7 (1.3%) tested positive for chlamydia. Positivity was 2.2% (5 of 227) for female students and 0.6% (2 of 310) for male students. Positivity by race/ethnicity was 5.4% (4 of 74) for blacks, 2.0% (2 of 98) for Hispanics, 0.3% (1 of 342) for Asian/Pacific Islanders, and 0% (0 of 4) for whites. The highest positivity was among black female students: 9.3% (4 of 43). Not including planning and follow-up, each case identified used 63 staff hours.
Despite high participation among students attending school in high morbidity neighborhoods, few infections were identified. This is likely because students have low rates of sexual activity and do not necessarily attend neighborhood schools. Screening used substantial resources. Sexually transmitted disease control programs considering school screening should consider local epidemiology and whether schools have substantial proportions of students likely at high risk for sexually transmitted diseases.
为那些被认为高危的青少年提供衣原体和淋病筛查及治疗,在旧金山的11年级和12年级学生中开展了学校筛查。
选择了衣原体和淋病发病率高且黑人学生人口比例≥15%的社区中的两所学校。学生观看了一个10分钟的演示并收到检测试剂盒。学生在私人浴室隔间决定是否进行检测。鼓励所有学生返还检测试剂盒(无论他们是否返还尿液样本)。
967名符合条件的学生中,853名(88%)到校。其中,21名(2%)拒绝参与,537名(63%)返还样本进行检测。接受检测的学生主要是异性恋(93%)且非白人(99%)。没有学生淋病检测呈阳性;7名(1.3%)衣原体检测呈阳性。女生阳性率为2.2%(227名中的5名),男生阳性率为0.6%(310名中的2名)。按种族/族裔划分,黑人阳性率为5.4%(74名中的4名),西班牙裔为2.0%(98名中的2名),亚太岛民为0.3%(342名中的1名),白人为0%(4名中的0名)。黑人女生阳性率最高:9.3%(43名中的4名)。不包括规划和随访,每发现一例病例耗费63个工作人员工时。
尽管在高发病率社区上学的学生参与度高,但发现的感染病例很少。这可能是因为学生性活动率低,且不一定就读于社区学校。筛查耗费了大量资源。考虑学校筛查的性传播疾病控制项目应考虑当地流行病学情况以及学校中可能感染性传播疾病高危的学生比例是否可观。