Suppr超能文献

[邻面釉质磨除后不同抛光方法对釉质的影响]

[The effect of different polishing methods on enamel after interproximal enamel reduction].

作者信息

Wu Hai-Miao, Zhao Bing-Jiao, Chen Dong

机构信息

Shanghai Stomatological Disease Center, Shanghai 200031, China.

出版信息

Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2008 Feb;17(1):96-9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to compare the effect of the enamel demineralization degree after interproximal enamel reduction (IER) on extracted teeth with different polishing methods.

METHODS

20 extracted premolars were chosen as samples. In one premolar, a randomized approximal surface was selected as control surface while the other as experimental surface. After IER, the control surface was physically polished and the experimental surface was chemically polished. All samples were treated under the pH cycling experiment for 60 days. Then the enamel demineralization degree was measured with laser fluorescence diagnostic equipment. The data was analyzed by paired t test using SPSS10.0 software package. Some samples were selected to observe the enamel surface morphology through scanning electron microscope (SEM).

RESULTS

The enamel demineralization degree of the control group increased significantly than that of the experimental group(P<0.01). SEM images demonstrated that the enamel surface was smoother in the experimental group than the control group.

CONCLUSION

Compared with physical polishing,chemical polishing can increase the smooth degree of enamel surface and reduce the risk of enamel demineralization after IER.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较不同抛光方法对离体牙邻面釉质磨除(IER)后釉质脱矿程度的影响。

方法

选取20颗离体前磨牙作为样本。在每颗前磨牙上,随机选择一个邻面作为对照面,另一个作为实验面。IER后,对照面进行物理抛光,实验面进行化学抛光。所有样本在pH循环实验下处理60天。然后用激光荧光诊断设备测量釉质脱矿程度。使用SPSS10.0软件包通过配对t检验分析数据。选取部分样本通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察釉质表面形态。

结果

对照组的釉质脱矿程度比实验组显著增加(P<0.01)。SEM图像显示实验组的釉质表面比对照组更光滑。

结论

与物理抛光相比,化学抛光可提高釉质表面光滑度,降低IER后釉质脱矿风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验