Lorgis Luc, Zeller Marianne, Dentan Gilles, Laurent Yves, Taam Jamal Abou, L'Huillier Isabelle, Vincent-Martin Michel, Makki Hamid, Cottin Yves
Service de Cardiologie, CHU Bocage, Bd Mal de Lattre de Tassigny, Dijon, France.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Apr 1;71(5):607-12. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21409.
The goal of the present study was to test the impact of ST segment resolution (STR) after rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on the short-term prognosis.
The prognostic value of STR after rescue PCI for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains undetermined.
From the French regional database, we analyzed 168 consecutive patients with STEMI and failed lysis, defined by <50 percent STR, who underwent rescue PCI. Patients were classified into two groups according to the degree of STR from the maximal ST-elevation measured on the single worst ECG lead before lysis and after rescue PCI: the without STR group (<50% STR) vs. the with STR group (> or =50%).
After rescue PCI, 26 (15%) patients did not have STR and 142 (85%) patients did. No difference was observed between the two groups regarding baseline characteristics, risk factors, and median time delay either from symptom onset to thrombolysis or from failed lysis to rescue PCI. We observed a lower proportion of patients with TIMI 2/3 flow post PCI in the without STR group (respectively 61% vs. 97%, P < 0.001) but an increased use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (34% vs. 8%, P < 0.001) in this group. Thirty-day mortality was markedly higher in the without STR group than in the with STR group (27% vs. 9% respectively, P = 0.025). Moreover, multivariate analysis showed that absence of STR (OR: 5.65; 95% CI: 1.24-25.67), was an independent prognostic factor for mortality.
We showed for the first time that analysis of ST-segment resolution may be a simple reliable tool to identify patients at high risk after rescue PCI, and may provide useful information for the elaboration of therapeutic strategies.
本研究旨在测试补救性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后ST段回落(STR)对短期预后的影响。
补救性PCI后STR对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的预后价值仍未确定。
从法国地区数据库中,我们分析了168例连续的STEMI患者,这些患者溶栓失败(定义为STR<50%)并接受了补救性PCI。根据溶栓前单次最严重心电图导联上测量的最大ST段抬高以及补救性PCI后的STR程度,将患者分为两组:无STR组(<50% STR)与有STR组(≥50%)。
补救性PCI后,26例(15%)患者没有STR,142例(85%)患者有STR。两组在基线特征、危险因素以及从症状发作到溶栓或从溶栓失败到补救性PCI的中位时间延迟方面均未观察到差异。我们观察到无STR组PCI后TIMI 2/3级血流的患者比例较低(分别为61%对97%,P<0.001),但该组主动脉内球囊反搏的使用增加(34%对8%,P<0.001)。无STR组的30天死亡率明显高于有STR组(分别为27%对9%,P = 0.025)。此外,多变量分析显示无STR(OR:5.65;95% CI:1.24 - 25.67)是死亡率的独立预后因素。
我们首次表明,ST段回落分析可能是识别补救性PCI后高危患者的一种简单可靠工具,并可为制定治疗策略提供有用信息。