Ilfeld Brian M, Le Linda T, Meyer R Scott, Mariano Edward R, Vandenborne Krista, Duncan Pamela W, Sessler Daniel I, Enneking F Kayser, Shuster Jonathan J, Theriaque Douglas W, Berry Linda F, Spadoni Eugene H, Gearen Peter F
Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Anesthesiology. 2008 Apr;108(4):703-13. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318167af46.
BACKGROUND: The authors tested the hypotheses that, compared with an overnight continuous femoral nerve block (cFNB), a 4-day ambulatory cFNB increases ambulation distance and decreases the time until three specific readiness-for-discharge criteria are met after tricompartment total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: Preoperatively, all patients received a cFNB (n = 50) and perineural ropivacaine 0.2% from surgery until the following morning, at which time they were randomly assigned to either continue perineural ropivacaine or switch to perineural normal saline. Primary endpoints included (1) time to attain three discharge criteria (adequate analgesia, independence from intravenous analgesics, and ambulation of at least 30 m) and (2) ambulatory distance in 6 min the afternoon after surgery. Patients were discharged with their cFNB and a portable infusion pump, and catheters were removed on postoperative day 4. RESULTS: Patients given 4 days of perineural ropivacaine attained all three discharge criteria in a median (25th-75th percentiles) of 25 (21-47) h, compared with 71 (46-89) h for those of the control group (estimated ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.67; P <0.001). Patients assigned to receive ropivacaine ambulated a median of 32 (17-47) m the afternoon after surgery, compared with 26 (13-35) m for those receiving normal saline (estimated ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.85; P = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with an overnight cFNB, a 4-day ambulatory cFNB decreases the time to reach three important discharge criteria by an estimated 53% after tricompartment total knee arthroplasty. However, the extended infusion did not increase ambulation distance the afternoon after surgery. (ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT00135889.).
背景:作者检验了以下假设:与过夜持续股神经阻滞(cFNB)相比,为期4天的门诊cFNB可增加全膝关节置换术后的行走距离,并缩短达到三项特定出院标准所需的时间。 方法:术前,所有患者均接受cFNB(n = 50),并在手术至次日早晨期间接受0.2%的神经周围罗哌卡因,届时将他们随机分配继续接受神经周围罗哌卡因或改用神经周围生理盐水。主要终点包括:(1)达到三项出院标准(充分镇痛、无需静脉镇痛且行走至少30米)的时间;(2)术后下午6分钟的行走距离。患者出院时携带cFNB和便携式输液泵,术后第4天拔除导管。 结果:接受4天神经周围罗哌卡因治疗的患者达到所有三项出院标准的中位时间(第25 - 75百分位数)为25(21 - 47)小时,而对照组为71(46 - 89)小时(估计比值为0.47;95%置信区间为0.32 - 0.67;P <0.001)。接受罗哌卡因治疗的患者术后下午的中位行走距离为32(17 - 47)米,而接受生理盐水治疗的患者为2 – 6(13 - 35)米(估计比值为1.21;95%置信区间为0.71 - 1.85;P = 0.42)。 结论:与过夜cFNB相比,为期4天的门诊cFNB可使全膝关节置换术后达到三项重要出院标准的时间缩短约53%。然而,延长输注时间并未增加术后下午的行走距离。(ClinicalTrials.gov编号:NCT00135889。)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014-5
Eur J Anaesthesiol Intensive Care. 2025-1-23
Saudi J Anaesth. 2023
Anesthesiology. 2007-8
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007
Anesthesiology. 2007-3
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007