Hofmann Stefan G, Smits Jasper A J
Department of Psychology, Boston University, Mass 02215, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;69(4):621-32. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0415.
Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is frequently used for various adult anxiety disorders, but there has been no systematic review of the efficacy of CBT in randomized placebo-controlled trials. The present study meta-analytically reviewed the efficacy of CBT versus placebo for adult anxiety disorders.
We conducted a computerized search for treatment outcome studies of anxiety disorders from the first available date to March 1, 2007. We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, the Institute of Scientific Information, and Dissertation Abstracts International for the following terms: random*, cognitive behaviortherap, cognitive therap*, behaviortherap, GAD, generalized anxiety disorder, OCD, obsessive compulsive disorder, social phobia, social anxiety disorder, specific phobia, simple phobia, PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder, and acute stress disorder. Furthermore, we examined reference lists from identified articles and asked international experts to identify eligible studies.
We included studies that randomly assigned adult patients between ages 18 and 65 years meeting DSM-III-R or DSM-IV criteria for an anxiety disorder to either CBT or placebo. Of 1165 studies that were initially identified, 27 met all inclusion criteria.
The 2 authors independently identified the eligible studies and selected for each study the continuous measures of anxiety severity. Dichotomous measures reflecting treatment response and continuous measures of depression severity were also collected. Data were extracted separately for completer (25 studies for continuous measures and 21 studies for response rates) and intent-to-treat (ITT) analyses (6 studies for continuous measures and 8 studies for response rates).
There were no significant differences in attrition rates between CBT and placebo. Random-effects models of completer samples yielded a pooled effect size (Hedges' g) of 0.73 (95% CI = 0.88 to 1.65) for continuous anxiety severity measures and 0.45 (95% CI = 0.25 to 0.65) for depressive symptom severity measures. The pooled odds ratio for completer treatment response rates was 4.06 (95% CI = 2.78 to 5.92). The strongest effect sizes were observed in obsessive-compulsive disorder and acute stress disorder, and the weakest effect size was found in panic disorder. The advantage of CBT over placebo did not depend on placebo modality, number of sessions, or study year.
Our review of randomized placebo-controlled trials indicates that CBT is efficacious for adult anxiety disorders. There is, however, considerable room for improvement. Also, more studies need to include ITT analyses in the future.
认知行为疗法(CBT)常用于治疗各种成人焦虑症,但尚无对随机安慰剂对照试验中CBT疗效的系统评价。本研究采用荟萃分析方法回顾了CBT与安慰剂治疗成人焦虑症的疗效。
我们对从首个可用日期至2007年3月1日的焦虑症治疗结果研究进行了计算机检索。我们在MEDLINE、PsycINFO、PubMed、Scopus、科学信息研究所和国际学位论文摘要数据库中检索了以下术语:随机*、认知行为治疗、认知治疗*、行为治疗、广泛性焦虑症(GAD)、广泛性焦虑障碍、强迫症(OCD)、强迫性障碍、社交恐惧症、社交焦虑障碍、特定恐惧症、单纯恐惧症、创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)、创伤后应激障碍和急性应激障碍。此外,我们查阅了已识别文章的参考文献列表,并邀请国际专家识别符合条件的研究。
我们纳入了将年龄在18至65岁之间、符合DSM-III-R或DSM-IV焦虑症标准的成年患者随机分配至CBT组或安慰剂组的研究。在最初识别的1165项研究中,27项符合所有纳入标准。
两位作者独立识别符合条件的研究,并为每项研究选择焦虑严重程度的连续性测量指标。还收集了反映治疗反应的二分法测量指标和抑郁严重程度的连续性测量指标。分别提取了完成者(连续性测量指标25项研究,反应率21项研究)和意向性分析(ITT)(连续性测量指标6项研究,反应率8项研究)的数据。
CBT组和安慰剂组的损耗率无显著差异。完成者样本的随机效应模型得出,连续性焦虑严重程度测量指标的合并效应量(Hedges'g)为0.73(95%CI = 0.88至1.65),抑郁症状严重程度测量指标的合并效应量为0.45(95%CI = 0.25至0.65)。完成者治疗反应率的合并优势比为4.06(95%CI = 2.78至5.92)。在强迫症和急性应激障碍中观察到最强的效应量,在惊恐障碍中发现最弱的效应量。CBT相对于安慰剂的优势不取决于安慰剂类型、疗程数或研究年份。
我们对随机安慰剂对照试验的回顾表明,CBT对成人焦虑症有效。然而,仍有很大的改进空间。此外,未来需要更多研究纳入ITT分析。