Suppr超能文献

股下静脉移植血管狭窄:切割球囊血管成形术作为一线治疗选择。

Infrainguinal vein graft stenosis: cutting balloon angioplasty as the first-line treatment of choice.

作者信息

Schneider Peter A, Caps Michael T, Nelken Nicolas

机构信息

Division of Vascular Therapy, Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Honolulu, Hawaii 96819, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2008 May;47(5):960-6; discussion 966. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.12.035. Epub 2008 Apr 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The optimal treatment for hemodynamically significant infrainguinal vein bypass graft stenosis is not known. This study compares three options as first choice for the revision of failing infrainguinal vein grafts: cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA), standard percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA), and open surgical revision (OS).

METHODS

Infrainguinal vein bypass graft lesions treated in a single institution during a 12-year period were evaluated. Of these, 161 lesions in 124 infrainguinal bypasses (101 patients) were treated with OS (n = 42), PTA (n = 57), or CBA (n = 62). The initial indication for the bypass in these patients was limb salvage in 73% and claudication in 27%. The primary outcome of interest was the development of vein graft occlusion or significant stenosis (>or=70%) as detected by surveillance duplex ultrasound scanning or arteriography some time after repair.

RESULTS

The stenosis-free patency rates at 48 months for OS, CBA, and PTA were 74%, 62%, and 34%, respectively. PTA was associated with an increased risk of treatment failure compared with both OS (hazard ratio [HR], 3.9; P < .0001) and CBA (HR, 3.1; P < .0001). There was no significant difference between OS and CBA (HR, 1.3 for CBA vs OS, P = .6). Pseudoaneurysms developed in two CBA patients. One ruptured and required interposition graft, and one was monitored.

CONCLUSION

Cutting balloon angioplasty is a reasonable, initial treatment for infrainguinal vein graft stenosis in most patients. It is a safe, minimally invasive, outpatient procedure with patency rates that are comparable to OS and superior to PTA.

摘要

目的

目前尚不清楚对血流动力学有显著影响的股腘静脉搭桥移植血管狭窄的最佳治疗方法。本研究比较了三种作为失败的股腘静脉移植血管翻修首选方案的选择:切割球囊血管成形术(CBA)、标准经皮腔内球囊血管成形术(PTA)和开放手术翻修(OS)。

方法

对在一个机构12年期间治疗的股腘静脉搭桥移植血管病变进行评估。其中,124例股腘静脉搭桥术(101例患者)中的161处病变接受了OS(n = 42)、PTA(n = 57)或CBA(n = 62)治疗。这些患者进行搭桥术的初始指征为73%是为了挽救肢体,27%是为了治疗跛行。主要关注的结局是修复后一段时间通过监测双功超声扫描或动脉造影检测到的静脉移植血管闭塞或显著狭窄(≥70%)的发生情况。

结果

OS、CBA和PTA在48个月时的无狭窄通畅率分别为74%、62%和34%。与OS(风险比[HR],3.9;P <.0001)和CBA(HR,3.1;P <.0001)相比,PTA与治疗失败风险增加相关。OS和CBA之间无显著差异(CBA与OS相比,HR为1.3,P = 0.6)。两名CBA患者发生了假性动脉瘤。1例破裂并需要置入移植血管,另1例进行了监测。

结论

对于大多数患者,切割球囊血管成形术是股腘静脉移植血管狭窄的一种合理的初始治疗方法。它是一种安全、微创的门诊手术,通畅率与OS相当且优于PTA。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验