Beavers K R, Greaves D K, Arbeille P, Hughson R L
Cardiorespiratory & Vascular Dynamics Lab, Univ. Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
J Gravit Physiol. 2007 Jul;14(1):P63-4.
Twenty-four (24) healthy women from 25-40 years of age underwent orthostatic tolerance tests consisting of passive tilt and lower body negative pressure before and after completing 60-days of continuous -6 degree head down tilt bed rest (HDBR). Prior to HDBR, participants were assigned to one of three groups: control, exercise or nutrition. We aimed to identify any acute head up tilt changes in mean arterial pressure, pulse pressure, total peripheral resistance, cardiac output, stroke volume, or heart rate, which might predict tolerance or changes in tolerance with HDBR. Generally, these attempts were largely unsuccessful. The results indicate that the mechanisms of orthostatic failure are not strongly related to the way in which the body responds to the initial challenge. Additionally, the observation that some variables were predictive of tolerance before and not after tilt may indicate a change in the strategies used to maintain blood pressure, or differential adaptations to HDBR.
24名年龄在25至40岁之间的健康女性在完成60天的持续-6度头低位卧床休息(HDBR)前后,接受了包括被动倾斜和下体负压在内的直立耐力测试。在HDBR之前,参与者被分为三组之一:对照组、运动组或营养组。我们旨在确定平均动脉压、脉压、总外周阻力、心输出量、每搏输出量或心率在急性头高位倾斜时的任何变化,这些变化可能预测对HDBR的耐受性或耐受性变化。一般来说,这些尝试大多没有成功。结果表明,直立性衰竭的机制与身体对初始挑战的反应方式没有强烈关联。此外,一些变量在倾斜前可预测耐受性而在倾斜后则不能,这一观察结果可能表明维持血压所采用的策略发生了变化,或者对HDBR有不同的适应性。