Kaymak Bayram, Ozçakar Levent, Cetin Alp, Candan Cetin Meral, Akinci Ayşen, Hasçelik Zafer
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Hacettepe, Ankara, Turkey.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Apr;89(4):743-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.041.
To clarify whether sonography or electrophysiologic testing is a better predictor of symptom severity and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and to assess the diagnostic value of sonography in patients with idiopathic CTS.
Cross-sectional.
University hospital physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic.
Thirty-four hands with CTS and 38 normative hands were evaluated.
Not applicable.
The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, which comprised symptom severity and functional status scale, was applied to CTS patients. Bilateral upper-extremity nerve conduction studies of median and ulnar nerves and sonographic imaging of the median nerve were performed in all participants. Sonographic evaluation was performed by a physician blinded to the physical and electrophysiologic findings of the subjects.
Cross-sectional areas (CSAs) of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel entrance and proximal carpal tunnel were 12.5+/-2.6 and 10.6+/-2.6 versus 15.6+/-4.2 and 11.5+/-3.2 in CTS patients versus controls, respectively. Increased CSA of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel entrance (P<.002) and at the proximal carpal tunnel (P<.000) were detected in the hands with CTS. Flattening ratios did not differ in a statistically significant manner between the groups (P>.05). The best predictor of symptom severity was median nerve sensory distal latency and that of functional status was median nerve motor distal latency. The optimum cutoff value for median nerve CSA was 11.2mm(2) at the carpal tunnel entrance and 11.9mm(2) at the proximal carpal tunnel. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values at the proximal carpal tunnel (88%, 66%, 71%, 80%, respectively) were higher than those at the carpal tunnel entrance (68%, 62%, 65%, 66%, respectively).
The best predictors of symptom severity and functional status in idiopathic CTS seem to be the electrophysiologic assessments rather than sonographic measurements. On the other hand, sonography may be helpful in the diagnosis of idiopathic CTS.
明确超声检查或电生理检查在腕管综合征(CTS)中对症状严重程度和功能状态的预测能力哪个更强,并评估超声检查在特发性CTS患者中的诊断价值。
横断面研究。
大学医院物理医学与康复诊所。
对34只患有CTS的手和38只正常手进行了评估。
不适用。
对CTS患者应用包含症状严重程度和功能状态量表的波士顿腕管问卷。对所有参与者进行双侧上肢正中神经和尺神经的神经传导研究以及正中神经的超声成像。超声评估由对受试者的体格检查和电生理检查结果不知情的医生进行。
CTS患者与对照组相比,腕管入口处和近端腕管处正中神经的横截面积(CSA)分别为12.5±2.6和10.6±2.6,而对照组分别为15.6±4.2和11.5±3.2。在患有CTS的手中,检测到腕管入口处(P<0.002)和近端腕管处(P<0.000)正中神经的CSA增加。两组之间的扁平率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。症状严重程度的最佳预测指标是正中神经感觉远端潜伏期,功能状态的最佳预测指标是正中神经运动远端潜伏期。腕管入口处正中神经CSA的最佳截断值为11.2mm²,近端腕管处为11.9mm²。近端腕管处的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值(分别为88%、66%、71%、80%)高于腕管入口处(分别为68%、62%、65%、66%)。
在特发性CTS中,症状严重程度和功能状态的最佳预测指标似乎是电生理评估而非超声测量。另一方面,超声检查可能有助于特发性CTS的诊断。