Suppr超能文献

超声造影评估肝脏局灶性病变的经济学评价:意大利多中心经验

Economic assessment of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for evaluation of focal liver lesions: a multicentre Italian experience.

作者信息

Romanini Laura, Passamonti Matteo, Aiani Luca, Cabassa Paolo, Raieli Giuseppina, Montermini Ilaria, Martegani Alberto, Grazioli Luigi, Calliada Fabrizio

机构信息

Diagnostic Imaging Department, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25125 Brescia, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2007 Dec;17 Suppl 6:F99-106. doi: 10.1007/s10406-007-0234-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and economic consequences of the introduction of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) into the diagnostic clinical algorithm for the characterization of incidental focal liver lesions (FLLs).

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 485 subjects at three hospitals in Italy. Two diagnostic algorithms were utilized: (1) a classic patient work-up, which included baseline US followed by a CT or MR examination, and (2) a new patient management scheme in which, following the baseline US, a CEUS examination was performed. For each pathway, both direct and indirect health costs for the National Health System (NHS) at two of the three hospitals involved in the study were calculated. Clinical outcome was measured in terms of number of cases correctly diagnosed, using contrast-enhanced CT/contrast-enhanced MR as the reference standard.

RESULTS

CEUS correctly differentiated (benign vs. malignant) 559 of 575 lesions (97.2%), with a sensitivity of 98.1% and a specificity of 95.7%. Histological characterization was correct in 502 of 575 lesions (87%) with a sensitivity of 90.5% and a specificity of 85.4%. In terms of cost, the conventional diagnostic algorithm incurred for the NHS a total cost of Euro 134.576,60 vs. Euro 55.674,30 with CEUS, for a saving of Euro 78.902 (Euro 162 per patient). For the hospitals, the total cost was Euro 147.045 without CEUS vs Euro 61.979 with CEUS, for a saving of Euro 85.065,96 or Euro 175,39 per patient.

CONCLUSION

The routine use of CEUS for the characterization of FLLs provides significant cost savings, both for the NHS and for the hospital.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估将超声造影(CEUS)引入偶发性肝脏局灶性病变(FLL)诊断临床流程的临床和经济后果。

方法

这项前瞻性研究在意大利的三家医院招募了485名受试者。采用了两种诊断算法:(1)经典的患者检查流程,包括基线超声检查,随后进行CT或MR检查;(2)新的患者管理方案,即在基线超声检查后进行CEUS检查。对于每种流程,计算了参与研究的三家医院中两家医院的国家卫生系统(NHS)的直接和间接医疗费用。以增强CT/增强MR作为参考标准,根据正确诊断的病例数衡量临床结果。

结果

CEUS正确鉴别了575个病变中的559个(97.2%),敏感性为98.1%,特异性为95.7%。575个病变中的502个(87%)组织学特征正确,敏感性为90.5%,特异性为85.4%。在成本方面,传统诊断算法使NHS的总成本为134,576.60欧元,而CEUS为55,674.30欧元,节省了78,902欧元(每位患者节省162欧元)。对于医院而言,无CEUS时的总成本为147,045欧元,有CEUS时为61,979欧元,节省了85,065.96欧元或每位患者节省175.39欧元。

结论

常规使用CEUS对FLL进行特征性诊断,可为NHS和医院节省大量成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验