Suppr超能文献

氩气成核:整合理论、模拟与实验

Argon nucleation: bringing together theory, simulations, and experiment.

作者信息

Kalikmanov V I, Wölk J, Kraska T

机构信息

Twister Supersonic Gas Solutions, Einsteinlaan 10, 2289 CC, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Chem Phys. 2008 Mar 28;128(12):124506. doi: 10.1063/1.2888995.

Abstract

We present an overview of the current status of experimental, theoretical, molecular dynamics (MD), and density functional theory (DFT) studies of argon vapor-to-liquid nucleation. Since the experimental temperature-supersaturation domain does not overlap with the corresponding MD and DFT domains, separate comparisons have been made: theory versus experiment and theory versus MD and DFT. Three general theoretical models are discussed: Classical nucleation theory (CNT), mean-field kinetic nucleation theory (MKNT), and extended modified liquid drop model-dynamical nucleation theory (EMLD-DNT). The comparisons are carried out for the area below the MKNT pseudospinodal line. The agreement for the nucleation rate between the nonclassical models and the MD simulations is very good--within 1-2 orders of magnitude--while the CNT deviates from simulations by about 3-5 orders of magnitude. Perfect agreement is demonstrated between DFT results and predictions of MKNT (within one order of magnitude), whereas CNT and EMLD-DNT show approximately the same deviation of about 3-5 orders of magnitude. At the same time the agreement between all theoretical models and experiment remains poor--4-8 orders of magnitude for MKNT, 12-14 orders for EMLD-DNT, and up to 26 orders for CNT. We discuss possible reasons for this discrepancy and the ways to carry out experiment and simulations within the common temperature-supersaturation domain in order to produce a unified picture of argon nucleation.

摘要

我们概述了氩气气-液成核的实验、理论、分子动力学(MD)和密度泛函理论(DFT)研究的现状。由于实验温度-过饱和度范围与相应的MD和DFT范围不重叠,因此进行了单独比较:理论与实验以及理论与MD和DFT的比较。讨论了三种一般理论模型:经典成核理论(CNT)、平均场动力学成核理论(MKNT)和扩展修正液滴模型-动力学成核理论(EMLD-DNT)。比较是在MKNT赝旋节线以下的区域进行的。非经典模型与MD模拟之间的成核速率一致性非常好——在1-2个数量级内——而CNT与模拟结果的偏差约为3-5个数量级。DFT结果与MKNT的预测结果显示出完美的一致性(在一个数量级内),而CNT和EMLD-DNT显示出大约相同的约3-5个数量级的偏差。同时,所有理论模型与实验之间的一致性仍然很差——MKNT为4-8个数量级,EMLD-DNT为12-14个数量级,CNT高达26个数量级。我们讨论了这种差异的可能原因,以及在共同的温度-过饱和度范围内进行实验和模拟的方法,以便对氩气成核形成统一的认识。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验