Black Tara, Trocmé Nico, Fallon Barbara, Maclaurin Bruce
Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, 246 Bloor Street West, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1, Canada.
Child Abuse Negl. 2008 Mar;32(3):393-404. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.10.002.
While child welfare policy and legislation reflects that children who are exposed to domestic violence are in need of protection because they are at risk of emotional and physical harm, little is known about the profile of families and children identified to the child welfare system and the system's response. The objective of this study was to examine the child welfare system's response to child maltreatment investigations substantiated for exposure to domestic violence (EDV).
This study is based on a secondary analysis of data collected in the 2003 Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect (CIS-2003). Bivariate analyses were conducted on substantiated investigations. A binary logistic regression was also conducted to attempt to predict child welfare placements for investigations involving EDV.
What emerges from this study is that the child welfare system's response to EDV largely depends on whether it occurs in isolation or with another substantiated form of child maltreatment. For example, children involved in substantiated investigations that involve EDV with another form of substantiated maltreatment are almost four times more likely than investigations involving only EDV to be placed in a child welfare setting (Adjusted Odds Ratio=3.87, p<.001).
These findings suggest that the involvement of child welfare has not resulted in the widespread placement of children exposed to domestic violence. The Canadian child welfare system is substantiating EDV at a high rate but is concluding that these families do not require child protection services.
There is debate in the literature about how the child welfare sector should respond to cases involving exposure to domestic violence. Contrary to conventional wisdom, this study finds that children who are the subject of investigations involving substantiated exposure to domestic violence are less likely to be removed from their home than children experiencing other forms of maltreatment. Strategies need to be developed to counter misperceptions about the intrusiveness of child welfare, and discussions need to take place about when it is appropriate for child welfare to become involved when children are exposed to domestic violence.
虽然儿童福利政策和立法表明,遭受家庭暴力的儿童因面临情感和身体伤害的风险而需要保护,但对于被儿童福利系统识别的家庭和儿童的情况以及该系统的应对措施,人们了解甚少。本研究的目的是考察儿童福利系统对因遭受家庭暴力(EDV)而被证实的儿童虐待调查的应对情况。
本研究基于对2003年加拿大儿童虐待和忽视报告发生率研究(CIS - 2003)中收集的数据进行二次分析。对已证实的调查进行双变量分析。还进行了二元逻辑回归分析,以尝试预测涉及EDV的调查中儿童福利安置情况。
本研究表明,儿童福利系统对EDV的应对很大程度上取决于它是单独发生还是与另一种已证实的儿童虐待形式同时发生。例如,在涉及EDV且伴有另一种已证实的虐待形式的已证实调查中,儿童被安置在儿童福利机构的可能性几乎是仅涉及EDV的调查的四倍(调整后的优势比 = 3.87,p <.001)。
这些发现表明,儿童福利机构的介入并未导致遭受家庭暴力的儿童被广泛安置。加拿大儿童福利系统对EDV的证实率很高,但却认定这些家庭不需要儿童保护服务。
关于儿童福利部门应如何应对涉及家庭暴力的案件,文献中存在争议。与传统观念相反,本研究发现,与遭受其他形式虐待的儿童相比,因遭受家庭暴力被证实而接受调查的儿童被带离家庭的可能性更小。需要制定策略来消除对儿童福利干预性的误解,并且需要讨论在儿童遭受家庭暴力时儿童福利何时介入才合适。