Robinson C Michael, Jenkins Paul J, White Timothy O, Ker Andrew, Will Elizabeth
The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Old Dalkeith Road, Edinburgh EH16 4SU, United Kingdom.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Apr;90(4):708-21. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00679.
Anterior dislocation of the glenohumeral joint in younger patients is associated with a high risk of recurrence and persistent functional deficits. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a primary arthroscopic Bankart repair, while controlling for the therapeutic effects produced by the arthroscopic intervention and joint lavage.
In a single-center, double-blind clinical trial, eighty-eight adult patients under thirty-five years of age who had sustained a primary anterior glenohumeral dislocation were randomized to receive either an arthroscopic examination and joint lavage alone or together with an anatomic repair of the Bankart lesion. Assessment of the rate of recurrent instability, functional outcome (with use of three scores), range of movement, patient satisfaction, direct health-service costs, and treatment complications was completed for eighty-four of these patients (forty-two in each group) during the subsequent two years.
In the two years after the primary dislocation, the risk of a further dislocation was reduced by 76% and the risk of all recurrent instability was reduced by 82% in the Bankart repair group compared with the group that had arthroscopy and lavage alone. The functional scores were also better (p < 0.05), the treatment costs were lower (p = 0.012), and patient satisfaction was higher (p < 0.001) after arthroscopic repair. The improved functional outcome appeared to be mediated through the prevention of instability since the functional outcome in patients with stable shoulders was similar, irrespective of the initial treatment allocation. The patients who had a Bankart repair and played contact sports were also more likely to have returned to their sport at two years (relative risk = 3.4, p = 0.007).
Following a first-time anterior dislocation of the shoulder, there is a marked treatment benefit from primary arthroscopic repair of a Bankart lesion, which is distinct from the so-called background therapeutic effect of the arthroscopic examination and lavage of the joint. However, primary repair does not appear to confer a functional benefit to patients with a stable shoulder at two years after the dislocation.
年轻患者的肩肱关节前脱位与较高的复发风险和持续的功能缺陷相关。本研究的目的是评估初次关节镜下Bankart修复术的疗效,同时控制关节镜干预和关节灌洗所产生的治疗效果。
在一项单中心、双盲临床试验中,88例年龄在35岁以下的初次发生肩肱关节前脱位的成年患者被随机分为两组,一组仅接受关节镜检查和关节灌洗,另一组在接受关节镜检查和关节灌洗的同时进行Bankart损伤的解剖修复。在随后的两年中,对其中84例患者(每组42例)的复发不稳定率、功能结局(使用三个评分)、活动范围、患者满意度、直接医疗服务成本和治疗并发症进行了评估。
与仅接受关节镜检查和灌洗的组相比,Bankart修复组在初次脱位后的两年中,再次脱位的风险降低了76%,所有复发不稳定的风险降低了82%。关节镜修复术后的功能评分也更好(p < 0.05),治疗成本更低(p = 0.012),患者满意度更高(p < 0.001)。功能结局的改善似乎是通过预防不稳定来介导的,因为肩部稳定的患者的功能结局相似,与最初的治疗分配无关。接受Bankart修复并进行接触性运动的患者在两年时也更有可能恢复运动(相对风险 = 3.4,p = 0.007)。
首次肩关节前脱位后,初次关节镜下修复Bankart损伤有显著的治疗益处,这与关节镜检查和关节灌洗的所谓背景治疗效果不同。然而,初次修复在脱位后两年似乎并未给肩部稳定的患者带来功能益处。