Liu Yuan, Jiang Xiaozhong, Huang Jiantao, Wu Yang, Wang Guodong, Jiang Lei, Li Wai, Zhao Yunfu
Department of Stomatology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Microsurgery. 2008;28(4):243-7. doi: 10.1002/micr.20489.
The aim of this article is to compare the superficial venous drainage system versus dual venous drainage system of radial forearm free flaps (RFFF) and its impact on flap survival. A total of 136 consecutive patients undergoing RFFF reconstruction for oral and maxillofacial surgical defects were reviewed retrospectively. In group l, both the superficial and deep veins were anastomosed to the neck recipient veins. In group 2, only the superficial vein was used for anastomosis. There were no statistical differences in venous problems between two groups (6/68 in group 1 vs. 5/68 in group 2, P = 0.75). The flap survival rate was 98.5% (66/68 in group 1 vs. 68/68 in group 2, P = 0.15). Although there are many theoretical advantages to dual venous drainage system anastomoses, they seem not to impact on flap survival in our experience.
本文旨在比较前臂桡侧游离皮瓣(RFFF)的浅静脉引流系统与双静脉引流系统及其对皮瓣存活的影响。回顾性分析了136例因口腔颌面外科缺损接受RFFF重建的连续患者。在第1组中,浅静脉和深静脉均与颈部受区静脉吻合。在第2组中,仅使用浅静脉进行吻合。两组之间的静脉问题无统计学差异(第1组6/68,第2组5/68,P = 0.75)。皮瓣存活率为98.5%(第1组66/68,第2组68/68,P = 0.15)。尽管双静脉引流系统吻合在理论上有许多优点,但根据我们的经验,它们似乎对皮瓣存活没有影响。