Song William Y, Kamath Srijit, Ozawa Shuichi, Ani Shlomi Al, Chvetsov Alexei, Bhandare Niranjan, Palta Jatinder R, Liu Chihray, Li Jonathan G
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610, USA.
Med Phys. 2008 Feb;35(2):480-6. doi: 10.1118/1.2825619.
The purpose of this study is to establish a comprehensive set of dose measurements data obtained from the X-ray Volumetric Imager (XVI, Elekta Oncology Systems) and the On-Board Imager (OBI, Varian Medical Systems) cone-beam CT (CBCT) systems. To this end, two uniform-density cylindrical acrylic phantoms with diameters of 18 cm (head phantom) and 30 cm (body phantom) were used for all measurements. Both phantoms included ion chamber placement holes in the center and at periphery (2 cm below surface). For the XVI unit, the four standard manufacturer-supplied protocols were measured. For the OBI unit, the full bow tie and half bow tie (and no bow tie) filters were used in combination with the two scanning modes; namely, full-fan and half-fan. The total milliampere x seconds (mA s) setting was also varied for each protocol to establish the linear relationship between the dose deposited and the mA s used (with all other factors being held constant). Half-value layers in aluminum (Al) were also measured for beam characteristic determination. For the XVI unit, the average dose ranged from 0.1 to 3.5 cGy with the highest dose measured using the "prostate" protocol with the body phantom. For the OBI unit, the average dose ranged from 1.1 to 8.3 cGy with the highest dose measured using the full-fan protocol with the head phantom. The measured doses were highly linear as a function of mA s, for both units, where the measurement points followed a linear relationship very closely with R2 > 0.99 for all cases. Half-value layers were between 4.6- and 7.0-mm-Al for the two CBCT units where XVI generally had more penetrating beams at the similar kVp settings. In conclusion, a comprehensive series of dose measurements were performed on the XVI and the OBI CBCT units. In the process, many of the important similarities and differences between the two systems were observed and summarized in this work.
本研究的目的是建立一套全面的剂量测量数据,这些数据来自于X射线容积成像仪(XVI,医科达肿瘤系统公司)和机载成像仪(OBI,瓦里安医疗系统公司)锥形束CT(CBCT)系统。为此,使用了两个直径分别为18 cm(头部模体)和30 cm(体部模体)的均匀密度圆柱形丙烯酸模体进行所有测量。两个模体在中心和外周(表面以下2 cm)均设有电离室放置孔。对于XVI设备,测量了制造商提供的四个标准协议。对于OBI设备,全蝴蝶结和半蝴蝶结(以及无蝴蝶结)滤过器与两种扫描模式结合使用;即全扇形和半扇形。每个协议的总毫安秒(mA s)设置也有所变化,以建立沉积剂量与所用mA s之间的线性关系(所有其他因素保持不变)。还测量了铝(Al)中的半值层以确定射线特性。对于XVI设备,平均剂量范围为0.1至3.5 cGy,使用体部模体的“前列腺”协议时测量到的剂量最高。对于OBI设备,平均剂量范围为1.1至8.3 cGy,使用头部模体的全扇形协议时测量到的剂量最高。对于两个设备,测量的剂量与mA s高度线性相关,所有情况下测量点都非常紧密地遵循线性关系,R2>0.99。两个CBCT设备的半值层在4.6至7.0 mm Al之间,在相似的千伏设置下,XVI的射线通常具有更强的穿透性。总之,对XVI和OBI CBCT设备进行了一系列全面的剂量测量。在此过程中,观察并总结了这两个系统之间许多重要的异同点。