Hamada Hiroyuki, Takahashi Ryouta, Noguchi Takumi, Shiraki Kentaro
Institute of Applied Physics, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Biotechnol Prog. 2008 Mar-Apr;24(2):436-43. doi: 10.1021/bp070350q.
Although a number of low-molecular-weight additives have been developed to suppress protein aggregation, it is unclear whether these aggregation suppressors affect various aggregation processes in the same manner. In this study, we evaluated the differences in the effect of solution additives on heat- and refolding-induced aggregation in the presence of guanidine (Gdn), arginine (Arg), and spermidine (Spd), and the comparable analysis showed the following differences: (i) Gdn did not suppress thermal aggregation but increased the yield of oxidative refolding. (ii) Spd showed the highest effect for heat-induced aggregation suppression among tested compounds, although it promoted aggregation in oxidative refolding. (iii) Arg was effective for both aggregation processes. Lysozyme solubility assay and thermal unfolding experiment showed that Spd was preferentially excluded from native lysozyme and Arg and Gdn solubilized the model state of intermediates during oxidative refolding. This preference of additives to protein surfaces is the cause of the different effect on aggregation suppression.
尽管已经开发出多种低分子量添加剂来抑制蛋白质聚集,但尚不清楚这些聚集抑制剂是否以相同方式影响各种聚集过程。在本研究中,我们评估了在胍(Gdn)、精氨酸(Arg)和亚精胺(Spd)存在下,溶液添加剂对热诱导聚集和重折叠诱导聚集影响的差异,可比分析显示出以下差异:(i)Gdn不抑制热聚集,但提高了氧化重折叠的产率。(ii)Spd在测试化合物中对热诱导聚集抑制效果最佳,尽管它在氧化重折叠中促进聚集。(iii)Arg对两种聚集过程均有效。溶菌酶溶解度测定和热解折叠实验表明,Spd优先从天然溶菌酶中被排除,而Arg和Gdn在氧化重折叠过程中使中间体的模型状态溶解。添加剂对蛋白质表面的这种偏好是对聚集抑制产生不同影响的原因。