Lasky-Su Jessica, Lyon Helen N, Emilsson Valur, Heid Iris M, Molony Cliona, Raby Benjamin A, Lazarus Ross, Klanderman Barbara, Soto-Quiros Manuel E, Avila Lydiana, Silverman Edwin K, Thorleifsson Gudmar, Thorsteinsdottir Unnur, Kronenberg Florian, Vollmert Caren, Illig Thomas, Fox Caroline S, Levy Daniel, Laird Nan, Ding Xiao, McQueen Matt B, Butler Johannah, Ardlie Kristin, Papoutsakis Constantina, Dedoussis George, O'Donnell Christopher J, Wichmann H-Erich, Celedón Juan C, Schadt Eric, Hirschhorn Joel, Weiss Scott T, Stefansson Kari, Lange Christoph
SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.
Am J Hum Genet. 2008 Apr;82(4):849-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.01.018.
The failure of researchers to replicate genetic-association findings is most commonly attributed to insufficient statistical power, population stratification, or various forms of between-study heterogeneity or environmental influences.(1) Here, we illustrate another potential cause for nonreplications that has so far not received much attention in the literature. We illustrate that the strength of a genetic effect can vary by age, causing "age-varying associations." If not taken into account during the design and the analysis of a study, age-varying genetic associations can cause nonreplication. By using the 100K SNP scan of the Framingham Heart Study, we identified an age-varying association between a SNP in ROBO1 and obesity and hypothesized an age-gene interaction. This finding was followed up in eight independent samples comprising 13,584 individuals. The association was replicated in five of the eight studies, showing an age-dependent relationship (one-sided combined p = 3.92 x 10(-9), combined p value from pediatric cohorts = 2.21 x 10(-8), combined p value from adult cohorts = 0.00422). Furthermore, this study illustrates that it is difficult for cross-sectional study designs to detect age-varying associations. If the specifics of age- or time-varying genetic effects are not considered in the selection of both the follow-up samples and in the statistical analysis, important genetic associations may be missed.
研究人员未能重复基因关联研究结果,最常见的原因是统计效力不足、群体分层、研究间各种形式的异质性或环境影响。(1) 在此,我们阐述了文献中迄今未得到太多关注的另一个导致无法重复研究结果的潜在原因。我们证明基因效应的强度可能随年龄变化,从而导致“年龄特异性关联”。如果在研究设计和分析过程中未予以考虑,年龄特异性基因关联可能导致无法重复研究结果。通过使用弗雷明汉心脏研究的10万个单核苷酸多态性(SNP)扫描,我们确定了ROBO1基因中的一个SNP与肥胖之间存在年龄特异性关联,并假设存在年龄-基因相互作用。这一发现随后在包含13584名个体的8个独立样本中得到跟进。该关联在8项研究中的5项中得到重复,显示出年龄依赖性关系(单侧合并p = 3.92 x 10^(-9),儿科队列的合并p值 = 2.21 x 10^(-8),成人队列的合并p值 = 0.00422)。此外,本研究表明横断面研究设计很难检测到年龄特异性关联。如果在随访样本的选择和统计分析中未考虑年龄或时间特异性基因效应的具体情况,可能会遗漏重要的基因关联。