Stopforth J D, Mai T, Kottapalli B, Samadpour M
Institute for Environmental Health, Incorporated, Seattle, Washington 98155, USA.
J Food Prot. 2008 Mar;71(3):625-8. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-71.3.625.
Recent foodborne outbreaks implicating spinach and lettuce have increased consumer concerns regarding the safety of fresh produce. While the most common commercial antimicrobial intervention for fresh produce is wash water containing 50 to 200 ppm chlorine, this study compares the effectiveness of acidified sodium chlorite, chlorine, and acidic electrolyzed water for inactivating Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella, and Listeria monocytogenes inoculated onto leafy greens. Fresh mixed greens were left uninoculated or inoculated with approximately 6 log CFU/g of E. coli O157:H7, Salmonella, and L. monocytogenes and treated by immersion for 60 or 90 s in different wash solutions (1:150, wt/vol), including 50 ppm of chlorine solution acidified to pH 6.5, acidic electrolyzed water (pH 2.1 +/- 0.2, oxygen reduction potential of 1,100 mV, 30 to 35 ppm of free chlorine), and acidified sodium chlorite (1,200 ppm, pH 2.5). Samples were neutralized and homogenized. Bacterial survival was determined by standard spread plating on selective media. Each test case (organism x treatment x time) was replicated twice with five samples per replicate. There was no difference (P > or = 0.05) in the time of immersion on the antimicrobial effectiveness of the treatments. Furthermore, there was no difference (P > or = 0.05) in survival of the three organisms regardless of treatment or time. Acidified sodium chlorite, resulted in reductions in populations of 3 to 3.8 log CFU/g and was more effective than chlorinated water (2.1 to 2.8 log CFU/g reduction). These results provide the produce industry with important information to assist in selection of effective antimicrobial strategies.
近期涉及菠菜和生菜的食源性疾病暴发事件增加了消费者对新鲜农产品安全性的担忧。虽然新鲜农产品最常见的商业抗菌干预措施是使用含50至200 ppm氯的洗涤水,但本研究比较了酸化亚氯酸钠、氯和酸性电解水对接种在绿叶蔬菜上的大肠杆菌O157:H7、沙门氏菌和单核细胞增生李斯特菌的灭活效果。新鲜混合绿叶蔬菜不接种或接种约6 log CFU/g的大肠杆菌O157:H7、沙门氏菌和单核细胞增生李斯特菌,然后在不同洗涤溶液(1:150,重量/体积)中浸泡60或90秒进行处理,这些洗涤溶液包括酸化至pH 6.5的50 ppm氯溶液、酸性电解水(pH 2.1±0.2,氧化还原电位为1100 mV,游离氯30至35 ppm)和酸化亚氯酸钠(1200 ppm,pH 2.5)。样品进行中和及均质处理。通过在选择性培养基上进行标准涂布平板法测定细菌存活率。每个测试案例(微生物×处理×时间)重复两次,每次重复有五个样品。浸泡时间对处理的抗菌效果没有差异(P≥0.05)。此外,无论处理方式或时间如何,三种微生物的存活率没有差异(P≥0.05)。酸化亚氯酸钠使菌数减少3至3.8 log CFU/g,比氯化水(减少2.1至2.8 log CFU/g)更有效。这些结果为农产品行业提供了重要信息,有助于选择有效的抗菌策略。