Clark L, Bechara A, Damasio H, Aitken M R F, Sahakian B J, Robbins T W
Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, UK.
Brain. 2008 May;131(Pt 5):1311-22. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn066. Epub 2008 Apr 3.
The ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and insular cortex are implicated in distributed neural circuitry that supports emotional decision-making. Previous studies of patients with vmPFC lesions have focused primarily on decision-making under uncertainty, when outcome probabilities are ambiguous (e.g. the Iowa Gambling Task). It remains unclear whether vmPFC is also necessary for decision-making under risk, when outcome probabilities are explicit. It is not known whether the effect of insular damage is analogous to the effect of vmPFC damage, or whether these regions contribute differentially to choice behaviour. Four groups of participants were compared on the Cambridge Gamble Task, a well-characterized measure of risky decision-making where outcome probabilities are presented explicitly, thus minimizing additional learning and working memory demands. Patients with focal, stable lesions to the vmPFC (n = 20) and the insular cortex (n = 13) were compared against healthy subjects (n = 41) and a group of lesion controls (n = 12) with damage predominantly affecting the dorsal and lateral frontal cortex. The vmPFC and insular cortex patients showed selective and distinctive disruptions of betting behaviour. VmPFC damage was associated with increased betting regardless of the odds of winning, consistent with a role of vmPFC in biasing healthy individuals towards conservative options under risk. In contrast, patients with insular cortex lesions failed to adjust their bets by the odds of winning, consistent with a role of the insular cortex in signalling the probability of aversive outcomes. The insular group attained a lower point score on the task and experienced more 'bankruptcies'. There were no group differences in probability judgement. These data confirm the necessary role of the vmPFC and insular regions in decision-making under risk. Poor decision-making in clinical populations can arise via multiple routes, with functionally dissociable effects of vmPFC and insular cortex damage.
腹内侧前额叶皮层(vmPFC)和岛叶皮层参与了支持情绪决策的分布式神经回路。先前对vmPFC损伤患者的研究主要集中在不确定性决策上,即结果概率不明确时(例如爱荷华赌博任务)。目前尚不清楚vmPFC在结果概率明确的风险决策中是否也是必需的。尚不清楚岛叶损伤的影响是否与vmPFC损伤的影响类似,或者这些区域对选择行为的贡献是否存在差异。在剑桥赌博任务中对四组参与者进行了比较,这是一种对风险决策进行充分表征的测量方法,其中结果概率明确呈现,从而将额外的学习和工作记忆需求降至最低。将vmPFC(n = 20)和岛叶皮层(n = 13)有局灶性、稳定性损伤的患者与健康受试者(n = 41)以及一组主要影响背侧和外侧额叶皮层的损伤对照组(n = 12)进行比较。vmPFC和岛叶皮层患者表现出投注行为的选择性和独特性破坏。vmPFC损伤与无论获胜几率如何都增加投注有关,这与vmPFC在使健康个体在风险下偏向保守选项方面的作用一致。相比之下,岛叶皮层损伤的患者未能根据获胜几率调整他们的投注,这与岛叶皮层在发出厌恶结果概率信号方面的作用一致。岛叶组在任务中获得的分数较低,并且经历了更多的“破产”。在概率判断方面没有组间差异。这些数据证实了vmPFC和岛叶区域在风险决策中的必要作用。临床人群中的决策不良可能通过多种途径出现,vmPFC和岛叶皮层损伤具有功能上可分离的影响。