Schiller Lawrence R, Johnson David A
Digestive Health Associates of Texas, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75246, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Apr;103(4):815-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01818.x.
Several high-profile drug withdrawals for safety issues have brought into focus the FDA's process for approving drugs and monitoring adverse experiences with those agents after marketing has begun. Gastroenterologists and their patients have been affected adversely by removal from the marketplace of two licensed agents for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS): alosetron and tegaserod. The criteria used by the FDA for assessment of the risks and benefits of drugs used for functional bowel problems seem to be different than those used for the treatment of other conditions and have resulted in drastic limitation of access to these drugs rather than just warnings about risks as they are discovered. Decisions that affect the availability of drugs for patients with functional bowel disease should be discussed with clinicians who take care of those patients before going into effect. The absence of this sort of consultation leaves physicians with serious limitations on their abilities to take care of patients.
几次因安全问题而备受瞩目的药物撤市事件,使美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的药物审批流程以及药品上市后不良反应监测流程成为焦点。两种用于治疗肠易激综合征(IBS)的已获许可药物——阿洛司琼和替加色罗——退出市场,给胃肠病学家及其患者带来了不利影响。FDA用于评估功能性肠病用药风险和益处的标准,似乎与用于治疗其他病症的标准不同,这导致这些药物的使用受到极大限制,而不仅仅是在发现风险时发出警告。影响功能性肠病患者用药可及性的决策,在生效前应与负责照料这些患者的临床医生进行讨论。缺乏这种咨询使得医生在照顾患者的能力方面受到严重限制。