Joyce Ted, Racine Andrew, Yunzal-Butler Cristina
Department of Economics and Finance, Baruch College, City University of New York, and National Bureau of Economic Research, USA.
J Policy Anal Manage. 2008 Spring;27(2):277-303. doi: 10.1002/pam.20325.
Recent analyses differ on how effective the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) is at improving infant health. We use data from nine states that participate in the Pregnancy Nutrition Surveillance System to address limitations in previous work. With information on the mother's timing of WIC enrollment, we test whether greater exposure to WIC is associated with less smoking, improved weight gain during pregnancy, better birth outcomes, and greater likelihood of breastfeeding. Our results suggest that much of the often reported association between WIC and lower rates of preterm birth is likely spurious, the result of gestational age bias. We find modest effects of WIC on fetal growth, inconsistent associations between WIC and smoking, limited associations with gestational weight gain, and some relationship with breastfeeding. A WIC effect exists, but on fewer margins and with less impact than has been claimed by policy analysts and advocates.
近期分析对于妇女、婴儿和儿童特殊补充营养项目(WIC)在改善婴儿健康方面的效果存在分歧。我们使用来自参与孕期营养监测系统的九个州的数据,以解决先前研究中的局限性。借助母亲参加WIC项目的时间信息,我们检验了更多地参与WIC项目是否与更少吸烟、孕期体重增加改善、更好的分娩结果以及更高的母乳喂养可能性相关。我们的结果表明,WIC与较低早产率之间经常被报道的关联很可能是虚假的,是胎龄偏差的结果。我们发现WIC对胎儿生长有适度影响,WIC与吸烟之间的关联不一致,与孕期体重增加的关联有限,以及与母乳喂养有一定关系。WIC确实有效果,但在比政策分析师和倡导者所声称的更少方面,且影响也更小。