Nagy Paul G, Konewko Ramon, Warnock Max, Bernstein Wendy, Seagull Jacob, Xiao Yan, George Ivan, Park Adrian
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Surg Innov. 2008 Mar;15(1):7-16. doi: 10.1177/1553350608316573.
Routine clinical information systems now have the ability to gather large amounts of data that surgical managers can access to create a seamless and proactive approach to streamlining operations and minimizing delays. The challenge lies in aggregating and displaying these data in an easily accessible format that provides useful, timely information on current operations. A Web-based, graphical dashboard is described in this study, which can be used to interpret clinical operational data, allow managers to see trends in data, and help identify inefficiencies that were not apparent with more traditional, paper-based approaches. The dashboard provides a visual decision support tool that assists managers in pinpointing areas for continuous quality improvement. The limitations of paper-based techniques, the development of the automated display system, and key performance indicators in analyzing aggregate delays, time, specialties, and teamwork are reviewed. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats associated with implementing such a program in the perioperative environment are summarized.
常规临床信息系统现在有能力收集大量数据,手术管理人员可以访问这些数据,以创建一种无缝且主动的方法来简化操作并尽量减少延误。挑战在于以易于访问的格式汇总和显示这些数据,从而提供有关当前操作的有用且及时的信息。本研究描述了一种基于网络的图形化仪表板,它可用于解读临床操作数据,让管理人员能够查看数据趋势,并有助于识别采用更传统的纸质方法时不明显的低效情况。该仪表板提供了一种可视化决策支持工具,可协助管理人员确定持续质量改进的领域。本文回顾了基于纸质技术的局限性、自动显示系统的开发以及分析总体延误、时间、专业和团队协作方面的关键绩效指标。总结了在围手术期环境中实施此类程序相关的优势、劣势、机会和威胁。