Yu Peiqiang, Doiron Kevin, Liu Dasen
College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, S7N 5A8.
J Agric Food Chem. 2008 May 14;56(9):3417-26. doi: 10.1021/jf800015x. Epub 2008 Apr 15.
The objective of this study was to use advanced synchrotron-sourced FTIR microspectroscopy (SFTIRM) as a novel approach to identify the differences in protein and carbohydrate molecular structure (chemical makeup) between these two varieties of barley and illustrate the exact causes for their significantly different degradation kinetics. Items assessed included (1) molecular structural differences in protein amide I to amide II intensities and their ratio within cellular dimensions, (2) molecular structural differences in protein secondary structure profile and their ratios, and (3) molecular structural differences in carbohydrate component peak profile. Our hypothesis was that molecular structure (chemical makeup) affects barley quality, fermentation, and degradation behavior in both humans and animals. Using SFTIRM, the protein and carbohydrate molecular structural chemical makeup of barley was revealed and identified. The protein molecular structural chemical makeup differed significantly between the two varieties of barleys. No difference in carbohydrate molecular structural chemical makeup was detected. Harrington was lower than Valier in protein amide I, amide II, and protein amide I to amide II ratio, while Harrington was relatively higher in model-fitted protein alpha-helix and beta-sheet, but lower in the others (beta-turn and random coil). These results indicated that it is the molecular structure of protein (chemical makeup) that may play a major role in the different degradation kinetics between the two varieties of barleys (not the molecular structure of carbohydrate). It is believed that use of the advanced synchrotron technology will make a significant step and an important contribution to research in examining the molecular structure (chemical makeup) of plant, feed, and seeds.
本研究的目的是使用先进的同步辐射源傅里叶变换红外光谱显微技术(SFTIRM)作为一种新方法,来识别这两个大麦品种之间蛋白质和碳水化合物分子结构(化学组成)的差异,并阐明它们降解动力学显著不同的确切原因。评估的项目包括:(1)细胞尺度内蛋白质酰胺I至酰胺II强度及其比值的分子结构差异;(2)蛋白质二级结构图谱及其比值的分子结构差异;(3)碳水化合物成分峰图谱的分子结构差异。我们的假设是分子结构(化学组成)会影响大麦在人类和动物体内的品质、发酵及降解行为。通过SFTIRM,揭示并识别了大麦的蛋白质和碳水化合物分子结构化学组成。两个大麦品种的蛋白质分子结构化学组成存在显著差异。未检测到碳水化合物分子结构化学组成的差异。哈林顿大麦在蛋白质酰胺I、酰胺II以及蛋白质酰胺I与酰胺II的比值方面低于瓦利尔大麦,而哈林顿大麦在模型拟合的蛋白质α-螺旋和β-折叠方面相对较高,但在其他方面(β-转角和无规卷曲)较低。这些结果表明,可能是蛋白质的分子结构(化学组成)在两个大麦品种不同的降解动力学中起主要作用(而非碳水化合物的分子结构)。据信,先进同步辐射技术的应用将在研究植物、饲料和种子的分子结构(化学组成)方面迈出重要一步并做出重要贡献。