Colditz I G
Cooperative Research Centre for Sheep Industry Innovation,University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
Trop Biomed. 2008 Feb;25(1 Suppl):41-9.
Strategies for control of gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) infections in sheep require information on the severity of infection and species (or genus) of parasite present. Tests for diagnosis of GIN fall into 3 classes. Current tests measure either: 1) the presence of eggs, worm antigens or worms themselves; 2) components of host immunity (e.g. antibodies, eosinophils, other immune mediators); or 3) components of host pathology (e.g. wool growth, body growth, appetite, blood loss, digestive enzymes, anaemia, hypoproteinaemia, odours). To offer advantages over current diagnostic methods, new tests need to be more informative, more accurate, more timely, cheaper, technically easier, or suitable for use in the field. To improve sheep management, a new test needs to determine severity or predict the onset and severity of infection. This is a technically more difficult challenge than qualitative diagnosis of the presence of infection and creates a substantial obstacle to the development of new diagnostic methods. Estimation of the performance characteristics of a test including its sensitivity, specificity and predictive value is important before widespread adoption. This paper reviews current diagnostic tests for GIN, and opportunities for new tests that aid management of infections or that inform the estimated breeding value of animals for use in programs that breed sheep for resistance to GIN. Gene marker and biomarker tests for resistance to GIN infection or disease will require validation in the population in which they are to be used and may require revalidation as the genetic background of the population changes over time. Estimation of the specificity, sensitivity, and predictive value of gene markers and biomarkers for GIN infection may help inform the value of these markers as selection criteria for use in breeding programs.
控制绵羊胃肠道线虫(GIN)感染的策略需要有关感染严重程度以及所存在寄生虫的种类(或属)的信息。GIN诊断测试分为三类。当前的测试要么测量:1)虫卵、蠕虫抗原或蠕虫本身的存在;2)宿主免疫成分(例如抗体、嗜酸性粒细胞、其他免疫介质);要么3)宿主病理成分(例如羊毛生长、身体生长、食欲、失血、消化酶、贫血、低蛋白血症、气味)。为了比当前的诊断方法更具优势,新测试需要提供更多信息、更准确、更及时、更便宜、技术上更简便或适用于现场使用。为了改善绵羊管理,新测试需要确定感染的严重程度或预测感染的发生和严重程度。这在技术上比定性诊断感染的存在更具挑战性,并且给新诊断方法的开发带来了重大障碍。在广泛采用之前,评估测试的性能特征,包括其敏感性、特异性和预测价值非常重要。本文综述了当前GIN的诊断测试,以及有助于感染管理或为用于培育抗GIN绵羊的项目中动物的估计育种价值提供信息的新测试的机会。针对GIN感染或疾病抗性的基因标记和生物标志物测试需要在其使用的群体中进行验证,并且可能需要随着群体遗传背景随时间变化而重新验证。评估GIN感染的基因标记和生物标志物的特异性、敏感性和预测价值可能有助于了解这些标记作为育种计划中选择标准的价值。