Suppr超能文献

医疗保健系统多维信任量表的开发与测试

Development and testing of the Multidimensional Trust in Health Care Systems Scale.

作者信息

Egede Leonard E, Ellis Charles

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Center for Health Disparities Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jun;23(6):808-15. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0613-1. Epub 2008 Apr 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the development and psychometric testing of the Multidimensional Trust in Health Care Systems Scale (MTHCSS).

METHODS

Scale development occurred in 2 phases. In phase 1, a pilot instrument with 70 items was generated from the review of the trust literature, focus groups, and expert opinion. The 70 items were pilot tested in a sample of 256 students. Exploratory factor analysis was used to derive an orthogonal set of correlated factors. In phase 2, the final scale was administered to 301 primary care patients to assess reliability and validity. Phase 2 participants also completed validated measures of patient-centered care, health locus of control, medication nonadherence, social support, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

In phase 1, a 17-item scale (MTHCSS) was developed with 10 items measuring trust in health care providers, 4 items measuring trust in health care payers, and 3 items measuring trust in health care institutions. In phase 2, the 17-item MTHCSS had a mean score of 63.0 (SD 8.8); the provider subscale had a mean of 40.0 (SD 6.2); the payers subscale had a mean of 12.8 (SD 3.0); and the institutions subscale had a mean of 10.3 (SD 2.1). Cronbach's alpha for the MTHCSS was 0.89 and 0.92, 0.74, and 0.64 for the 3 subscales. The MTHCSS was significantly correlated with patient-centered care (r = .22 to .62), locus of control-chance (r = .42), medication nonadherence (r = -.22), social support (r = .25), and patient satisfaction (r = .67).

CONCLUSIONS

The MTHCSS is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the 3 objects of trust in health care and is correlated with patient-level health outcomes.

摘要

目的

描述医疗保健系统多维信任量表(MTHCSS)的开发及心理测量测试。

方法

量表开发分两个阶段进行。在第一阶段,通过对信任文献的回顾、焦点小组讨论和专家意见,编制了一个包含70个条目的初步工具。这70个条目在256名学生样本中进行了预测试。采用探索性因素分析得出一组正交相关因素。在第二阶段,将最终量表施测于301名初级保健患者,以评估其信效度。第二阶段的参与者还完成了以患者为中心的护理、健康控制点、药物治疗依从性、社会支持和患者满意度的有效测量。

结果

在第一阶段,开发了一个包含17个条目的量表(MTHCSS),其中10个条目测量对医疗保健提供者的信任,4个条目测量对医疗保健支付方的信任,3个条目测量对医疗保健机构的信任。在第二阶段,17个条目的MTHCSS平均得分为63.0(标准差8.8);提供者子量表平均分为40.0(标准差6.2);支付方子量表平均分为12.8(标准差3.0);机构子量表平均分为10.3(标准差2.1)。MTHCSS的Cronbach's α系数为0.89,三个子量表的Cronbach's α系数分别为0.92、0.74和0.64。MTHCSS与以患者为中心的护理(r = 0.22至0.62)、机遇控制点(r = 0.42)、药物治疗不依从(r = -0.22)、社会支持(r = 0.25)和患者满意度(r = 0.67)显著相关。

结论

MTHCSS是一种有效且可靠的工具,可用于测量医疗保健中信任的三个对象,并与患者层面的健康结果相关。

相似文献

1
Development and testing of the Multidimensional Trust in Health Care Systems Scale.
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jun;23(6):808-15. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0613-1. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
2
Development and testing of the health care system distrust scale.
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Jan;19(1):57-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.21146.x.
4
Development and testing of a scale to measure trust in the public healthcare system.
Indian J Med Ethics. 2015 Jul-Sep;12(3):149-57. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2015.044.
5
Development and Validation of the Trust in My Doctor, Trust in Doctors in General, and Trust in the Health Care Team Scales.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Apr;298:114827. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114827. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
6
Development and validation of the patient trust in community pharmacists (TRUST-Ph) scale: results from a study conducted in Thailand.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2008 Sep;4(3):272-83. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2007.10.002. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
7
Trust in Nurses Scale: construct validity and internal reliability evaluation.
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Mar;66(3):683-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05168.x.
8
The health care relationship (HCR) trust scale: development and psychometric evaluation.
Res Nurs Health. 2006 Oct;29(5):477-88. doi: 10.1002/nur.20158.
9
Measuring trust in nurses - Psychometric properties of the Trust in Nurses Scale in four countries.
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Dec;25:46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2016.09.006. Epub 2016 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

2
Pilot evaluation of the Health Organization and System Trustworthiness scale: reliability and validity testing.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 21;25(1):739. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12724-7.
7
Practice Guidelines for the Value Evaluation of Clinical Pharmacy Services (version 2).
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 14;12:1472355. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1472355. eCollection 2024.
8
Affordability, negative experiences, perceived racism, and health care system distrust among black American women aged 45 and over.
AIMS Public Health. 2024 Sep 26;11(4):1030-1048. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024053. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

2
A measure of trust in insurers.
Health Serv Res. 2006 Feb;41(1):58-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00456.x.
4
Cultural mistrust and use of hospice care: challenges and remedies.
J Palliat Med. 2004 Feb;7(1):63-71. doi: 10.1089/109662104322737269.
5
Development and testing of the health care system distrust scale.
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Jan;19(1):57-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.21146.x.
7
8
Race and trust in the health care system.
Public Health Rep. 2003 Jul-Aug;118(4):358-65. doi: 10.1093/phr/118.4.358.
9
Trust in the medical profession: conceptual and measurement issues.
Health Serv Res. 2002 Oct;37(5):1419-39. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.01070.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验