Rommens P M, Kuechle R, Bord Th, Lewens T, Engelmann R, Blum J
Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospitals of the Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Injury. 2008 Dec;39(12):1319-28. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.01.014. Epub 2008 Apr 15.
Unreamed interlocked humeral nailing for stabilisation of acute humeral fractures was introduced a decade ago. Antegrade and retrograde nail insertion are equally popular. The role of nailing as opposed to plating of humeral fractures is the subject of continuous debate. Between 1997 and 2005, 99 acute fractures of the humeral shaft were treated operatively with the unreamed humeral nail (UHN, Synthes) in our Level I Trauma Centre. The mean age of the patients was 63 years. Only eight patients (8.1%) were polytraumatised, nine patients had an open fracture (9.1%), five had a primary radial nerve palsy (5.1%). There were 54 antegrade and 45 retrograde nailings. The procedures were performed by 19 different surgeons, who carefully followed a detailed operation protocol. There were 6 adverse events: 3 secondary radial nerve palsies (3%), 2 fissures at the insertion point (2%) and one false placement of a locking screw (1%). Three patients developed pseudarthrosis (3%). Eight further operation were necessary (8.1%): 3 exploration of the radial nerve, 3 for treatment of pseudarthrosis, one replacement of a locking screw and one wound revision for superficial wound infection. Ninety patients (92 fractures) were evaluated after bone healing. Shoulder function was assessed using the Constant Score, elbow function with the Mayo Elbow Score. 91.3% and 5.4% of patients had an excellent or good shoulder function, 81.5% and 14.1% had an excellent or good elbow function. All patients with a functional deficit of the shoulder joint had antegrade, all patients with a deficit at the elbow joint retrograde nailing. Motor function recovered in all radial nerve palsies. 93.5% of patients had an excellent or good functional end result. Unreamed humeral nailing is a valid therapeutic option for stabilisation of acute humeral shaft fractures. Antegrade and retrograde nailing are associated with specific but different complications. By strictly adhering to the operation technique, the number and severity of complications can be reduced. When good fracture alignment and stability are obtained, uneventful bone healing with good functional outcome is the rule.
十年前开始采用非扩髓带锁髓内钉固定急性肱骨干骨折。顺行和逆行髓内钉置入同样常用。髓内钉固定相对于钢板固定治疗肱骨干骨折的作用一直是持续争论的话题。1997年至2005年间,在我们的一级创伤中心,99例急性肱骨干骨折采用非扩髓肱骨髓内钉(UHN,Synthes公司)进行手术治疗。患者的平均年龄为63岁。仅8例患者(8.1%)为多发伤,9例患者为开放性骨折(9.1%),5例患者出现原发性桡神经麻痹(5.1%)。有54例顺行和45例逆行髓内钉置入。手术由19位不同的外科医生进行,他们严格遵循详细的手术方案。发生6例不良事件:3例继发性桡神经麻痹(3%),2例在置入点出现骨裂(2%),1例锁定螺钉位置错误(1%)。3例患者发生骨不连(3%)。还需要进行8例进一步手术(8.1%):3例探查桡神经,3例治疗骨不连,1例更换锁定螺钉,1例因表浅伤口感染进行伤口清创。90例患者(92处骨折)在骨折愈合后接受评估。采用Constant评分评估肩关节功能,采用Mayo肘关节评分评估肘关节功能。91.3%和5.4%的患者肩关节功能为优或良,81.5%和14.1%的患者肘关节功能为优或良。所有肩关节功能有缺陷的患者均采用顺行髓内钉置入,所有肘关节功能有缺陷的患者均采用逆行髓内钉置入。所有桡神经麻痹患者的运动功能均恢复。93.5%的患者获得优或良的功能最终结果。非扩髓肱骨髓内钉固定是稳定急性肱骨干骨折的一种有效治疗选择。顺行和逆行髓内钉置入会出现特定但不同的并发症。严格遵循手术技术可减少并发症的数量和严重程度。当获得良好的骨折对线和稳定性时,骨折顺利愈合并获得良好的功能结果是常见的情况。