Bell Nicole S
Social Sectors Development Strategies, Inc.
J Interpers Violence. 2009 May;24(5):751-69. doi: 10.1177/0886260508317193. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
Little is known about health and occupational outcomes of male spouse abuse victims. In all, 11,294 male spouse abuse victims with a history of spouse abuse perpetration, 3,277 victims without prior spouse abuse perpetration, and 72,855 nonvictims and nonperpetrators were followed for 12 years to assess army attrition and hospitalization risk. In multivariate Cox models controlling for age, race, education, rank, service time, and dependents, victims were at significantly greater risk for early army discharge and hospitalization than were nonvictims- particularly hospitalizations for depression, alcohol dependence, and mental health-even when the hospitalization occurred years after the abuse event. Victim-perpetrators had greater risk than did victim-nonperpetrators for both attrition (1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08-1.18; 1.05, 95% CI = 1.02-1.08, respectively) and hospitalizations (1.45, 95% CI = 1.38-1.52; 1.38, 95% CI = 1.27-1.49, respectively). College education was protective and deserves further inquiry. Male victims need greater support following spouse abuse.
对于男性配偶虐待受害者的健康和职业结局,人们知之甚少。总共对11294名有配偶虐待行为史的男性配偶虐待受害者、3277名无先前配偶虐待行为的受害者以及72855名非受害者和非施虐者进行了为期12年的跟踪,以评估军队人员损耗和住院风险。在控制了年龄、种族、教育程度、军衔、服役时间和家属情况的多变量Cox模型中,与非受害者相比,受害者提前退伍和住院的风险显著更高——尤其是因抑郁症、酒精依赖和心理健康问题住院——即使住院发生在虐待事件数年之后。既是受害者又是施虐者的人在人员损耗(分别为1.13,95%置信区间[CI]=1.08 - 1.18;1.05,95%CI = 1.02 - 1.08)和住院方面(分别为1.45,95%CI = 1.38 - 1.52;1.38,95%CI = 1.27 - 1.49)比仅是受害者而非施虐者的人风险更高。大学教育具有保护作用,值得进一步探究。男性受害者在遭受配偶虐待后需要更多支持。