Suppr超能文献

什么是社区获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌?

What is community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus?

作者信息

David Michael Z, Glikman Daniel, Crawford Susan E, Peng Jie, King Kimberly J, Hostetler Mark A, Boyle-Vavra Susan, Daum Robert S

机构信息

Infectious Diseases Section, Department of Pediatrics, the University of Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

出版信息

J Infect Dis. 2008 May 1;197(9):1235-43. doi: 10.1086/533502.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infection has been defined as an MRSA infection in a patient who lacks specific risk factors for healthcare exposure. We sought to determine whether the absence or presence of these risk factors still predicts the phenotypic or genotypic characteristics of MRSA strains.

METHODS

All clinical MRSA isolates were prospectively collected at the University of Chicago Hospitals from July 2004 through June 2005. Patients were interviewed and/or their medical records were reviewed. Isolates underwent genotyping and susceptibility testing. Data on patients and isolates were stratified in accordance with 8 frequently cited criteria for the identification of CA-MRSA and compared for concordance.

RESULTS

Among 616 unique patients from whom MRSA isolates were recovered, 404 (65.6%) had risk factors for healthcare exposure. Of the 404 isolates recovered from these patients, 166 (41.1%) were clindamycin susceptible, 190 (47.0%) carried staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type IV, 145 (35.9%) carried the Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes (PVL+), and 162 (40.1%) were identified as sequence type (ST) 8 by multilocus sequence typing (MLST), all of which are characteristics commonly attributed to CA-MRSA strains.

CONCLUSIONS

Association with the healthcare environment now has little predictive value for distinguishing patients with infection due to multidrug resistant MRSA isolates from those infected by CA-MRSA isolates, that is, isolates that are clindamycin-susceptible, PVL+, ST8, and/or contain SCCmec type IV. Defining CA-MRSA by the absence of risk factors for healthcare exposure greatly underestimates the burden of epidemic CA-MRSA disease.

摘要

背景

社区获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(CA-MRSA)感染被定义为在缺乏医疗保健暴露特定风险因素的患者中发生的MRSA感染。我们试图确定这些风险因素的有无是否仍能预测MRSA菌株的表型或基因型特征。

方法

2004年7月至2005年6月在芝加哥大学医院前瞻性收集所有临床MRSA分离株。对患者进行访谈和/或查阅其病历。分离株进行基因分型和药敏试验。根据8项常用于鉴定CA-MRSA的标准对患者和分离株的数据进行分层,并比较其一致性。

结果

在616例分离出MRSA的独特患者中,404例(65.6%)有医疗保健暴露风险因素。从这些患者中分离出的404株菌株中,166株(41.1%)对克林霉素敏感,190株(47.0%)携带葡萄球菌盒式染色体mec(SCCmec)IV型,145株(35.9%)携带杀白细胞素基因(PVL+),162株(40.1%)通过多位点序列分型(MLST)鉴定为序列型(ST)8,所有这些都是通常归因于CA-MRSA菌株特征。

结论

与医疗环境的关联现在对于区分耐多药MRSA分离株感染患者和CA-MRSA分离株感染患者(即对克林霉素敏感、PVL+、ST8和/或含有SCCmec IV型的分离株)几乎没有预测价值。通过缺乏医疗保健暴露风险因素来定义CA-MRSA大大低估了流行的CA-MRSA疾病负担。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验