Herrera Samuel, Bordas Josep M, Llach Josep, Ginès Angels, Pellisé Maria, Fernández-Esparrach Glòria, Mondelo Fernando, Mata Alfredo, Cárdenas Andres, Castells Antoni
Endoscopy Unit, Institut de Malalties Digestives i Metabòliques, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Sep;68(3):440-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.02.009. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
Despite different forms of treatment, few studies have been performed on the outcome and prognosis of patients admitted to the hospital because of gastric vascular ectasia (GVE) and upper-GI bleeding (UGIB). There is also little knowledge on the efficacy of argon plasma coagulation (APC) in different subgroups of GVE lesions.
This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of APC in patients admitted to the hospital with UGIB because of GVE.
Prospective evaluation of consecutive cases of UGIB because of GVE.
Tertiary and university-affiliated hospital.
Twenty-nine patients were included and divided into 3 subgroups: focal vascular ectasia lesions (FVE) (n = 10), portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) (n = 11), and gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) (n = 8). Patients were followed at 3 months and every 6 months thereafter during a mean of 23.1 months (range 18-37 months). All patients received intensive APC treatment that was repeated, depending on the endoscopic appearance or clinical evaluation.
The overall success of APC treatment was 86%, with only one recurrence of UGIB during the follow-up period. The number of APC sessions was 1.2, 2.2, and 2.3, in each subgroup (not significant), with a total number of sessions of 1.9 +/- 1.3. Treatment success was 90% in the FVE group, 81% in the PHG group, and 87.5% in the GAVE group (NS). The rise in hematocrit from baseline values in the overall group and in each subgroup was significant (P > .01).
A single-center study and small sample.
Endoscopic thermal ablation with APC is effective in managing UGIB and in reducing transfusion requirements in patients admitted for GI hemorrhage because of different endoscopic types of GVE.
尽管有不同的治疗方式,但针对因胃血管扩张(GVE)和上消化道出血(UGIB)入院患者的治疗结果及预后的研究较少。对于氩离子凝固术(APC)在不同亚组GVE病变中的疗效也知之甚少。
本研究旨在评估APC对因GVE导致UGIB而入院患者的疗效。
对因GVE导致UGIB的连续病例进行前瞻性评估。
三级大学附属医院。
纳入29例患者,分为3个亚组:局灶性血管扩张病变(FVE)(n = 10)、门脉高压性胃病(PHG)(n = 11)和胃窦血管扩张(GAVE)(n = 8)。患者在3个月时进行随访,此后每6个月随访一次,平均随访23.1个月(范围18 - 37个月)。所有患者均接受强化APC治疗,根据内镜表现或临床评估重复治疗。
APC治疗的总体成功率为86%,随访期间仅1例UGIB复发。各亚组的APC治疗次数分别为1.2、2.2和2.3次(无显著差异),总治疗次数为1.9±1.3次。FVE组治疗成功率为90%,PHG组为81%,GAVE组为87.5%(无显著差异)。总体组及各亚组血细胞比容较基线值均显著升高(P >.01)。
单中心研究且样本量小。
对于因不同内镜类型GVE导致胃肠道出血而入院的患者,采用APC进行内镜热消融治疗UGIB有效,并可减少输血需求。