Suppr超能文献

颞叶癫痫中海马切除长度两种不同测量技术的比较:一项前瞻性研究的结果

Comparison of two different measurement techniques of hippocampal resection length in temporal lobe epilepsy: results of a prospective study.

作者信息

Scorzin J E, König R, Müller C-A, Fimmers R, Urbach H, Lehmann T-N, Zentner J, Schramm J

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008 Aug;150(8):785-95; discussion 795. doi: 10.1007/s00701-008-1551-8. Epub 2008 Apr 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volumetry has evolved to a highly sensitive method for presurgical detection of hippocampal sclerosis in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Seizure resolution and neuropsychological sequelae are believed to correlate with extent of resection. Therefore an easy volumetric method to determine extent of resection is desirable. The purpose of this work is to evaluate and compare two different measurement techniques for hippocampal resection length.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients with a mean seizure history of 25.1 years and medically intractable TLE were included. They underwent MRI with sagittal acquired 3D T1-weighted spoiled gradient recalled echo sequence in 1 mm(3) isotropic voxel. Hippocampal resection length was calculated with two different methods. In the slice counting method (SCM) the number of consecutive 1-mm-thick slices containing resected hippocampus formation was counted. In the vector method (VM) the sum of the oblique and thus longer distances between the centre points of segmented hippocampal areas on each MRI slice were calculated.

RESULTS

Since the hippocampus is a curved body, the resection lengths measured with VM were always larger than measured with SCM. The comparison of resection length expressed in "percent of total length" showed good agreement between the two methods, because unlike the absolute values of resection length, the percentage values are unaffected by the three-dimensional shape of the hippocampus.

CONCLUSION

The easier and quicker method of "slice counting" may be used to determine resection length expressed in "percent of total length", giving reliable values for resection length but causing less volumetric work.

摘要

背景

磁共振成像(MRI)容积测量已发展成为一种用于术前检测颞叶癫痫(TLE)中海马硬化的高度敏感方法。癫痫发作缓解和神经心理学后遗症被认为与切除范围相关。因此,需要一种简单的容积测量方法来确定切除范围。本研究的目的是评估和比较两种不同的测量技术用于测量海马切除长度。

方法

纳入61例平均癫痫病史为25.1年且药物难治性TLE患者。他们接受了MRI检查,采用矢状面采集的3D T1加权扰相梯度回波序列,体素各向同性为1mm³。采用两种不同方法计算海马切除长度。在切片计数法(SCM)中,计算包含切除海马结构的连续1mm厚切片的数量。在向量法(VM)中,计算每个MRI切片上分割海马区域中心点之间的斜向且较长距离的总和。

结果

由于海马是一个弯曲的结构,VM测量的切除长度总是大于SCM测量的切除长度。以“总长度百分比”表示的切除长度比较显示,两种方法之间具有良好的一致性,因为与切除长度的绝对值不同,百分比值不受海马三维形状的影响。

结论

更简单、快速的“切片计数”方法可用于确定以“总长度百分比”表示的切除长度,可提供可靠的切除长度值,但减少了容积测量工作。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验