Suppr超能文献

新诊断方法对高危血液学患者抗真菌治疗方案的贡献。

Contribution of new diagnostic approaches to antifungal treatment plans in high-risk haematology patients.

作者信息

Einsele H, Loeffler J

机构信息

Medizinische Klinik II, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzberg, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008 May;14 Suppl 4:37-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.01980.x.

Abstract

In high-risk patient cohorts, such as patients after solid-organ or allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, or patients with acute leukaemia, early diagnosis of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) is essential, as delayed or missing diagnosis of IFI results in increasing rates of mortality. However, diagnosis of most IFIs, especially of invasive aspergillosis, is difficult because classic tests have low sensitivity and specificity, and radiology often provides non-specific and transient results. The limited sensitivity and specificity of conventional assays for the detection of IFI and the growing number of immunocompromised patients who are at risk for opportunistic fungal infections have led to the development of new assays. These methods include antigen detection systems, such as ELISAs, and different molecular methods (PCR assays). Serological tests, such as the detection of the carbohydrate galactomannan, are standardised and commercially available. However, they still need to be evaluated in large patient cohorts, especially children. The benefit of antibody detection remains unclear if patients are under immune suppression or are heavily colonised but not infected. A range of different PCR assays (conventional, nested, real-time) have been developed, targeting different gene regions (cytochrome P450, heat-shock proteins, 18S, 5.8S, 28S, internal transcribed spacer), including a variety of amplicon detection methods, such as gel electrophoresis, hybridisation with specific probes, ELISA and restriction fragment length polymorphism. These molecular assays provide high potential in terms of sensitivity and specificity, but vary widely in their feasibility and up to now have not been standardised. Taken together, new non-culture-based diagnostic assays are appropriate as simple and rapid screening tests with high sensitivities and quick turnaround times. Thus, they might help to reduce empirical antifungal therapy and might be valuable tools to allow early initiation and monitoring of pre-emptive antifungal therapy. In this review, we assess the performance of a variety of non-culture-based tests for the detection of IFI in high-risk haematological patients, with emphasis on the impact of the assays on different management strategies.

摘要

在高风险患者群体中,如实性器官移植或异基因干细胞移植后的患者,或急性白血病患者,侵袭性真菌感染(IFI)的早期诊断至关重要,因为IFI诊断延迟或漏诊会导致死亡率上升。然而,大多数IFI的诊断,尤其是侵袭性曲霉病的诊断很困难,因为传统检测方法的敏感性和特异性较低,而且放射学检查结果往往不具特异性且呈一过性。传统IFI检测方法的敏感性和特异性有限,以及免疫功能低下的机会性真菌感染高危患者数量不断增加,促使了新检测方法的开发。这些方法包括抗原检测系统,如酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA),以及不同的分子方法(聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测)。血清学检测,如检测半乳甘露聚糖,已标准化且有商业产品。然而,它们仍需在大量患者群体中进行评估,尤其是儿童。对于免疫抑制患者或真菌大量定植但未感染的患者,抗体检测的益处仍不明确。已经开发了一系列不同的PCR检测方法(传统PCR、巢式PCR、实时PCR),针对不同的基因区域(细胞色素P450、热休克蛋白、18S、5.8S、28S、内转录间隔区),包括多种扩增子检测方法,如凝胶电泳、与特异性探针杂交、ELISA和限制性片段长度多态性分析。这些分子检测方法在敏感性和特异性方面具有很大潜力,但可行性差异很大,截至目前尚未标准化。总体而言,新的非培养诊断检测方法适合作为具有高敏感性和快速周转时间的简单快速筛查试验。因此,它们可能有助于减少经验性抗真菌治疗,并且可能是允许早期启动和监测抢先抗真菌治疗的有价值工具。在本综述中,我们评估了多种非培养检测方法在高危血液学患者中检测IFI的性能,重点是这些检测方法对不同管理策略的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验