Górecki Aleksander I, Stec Sebastian, Kucharska Iwona, Wełnicki Marcin, Zaborska Beata, Kryński Tomasz, Kułakowski Piotr
Szpital Grochowski w Warszawie, Klinika Kardiologii CMKP.
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2007 Dec;23(138):408-12.
Rectilinear biphasic cardioversion (Bi-DC) has been shown to be very effective for restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). There is, however, limited information on factors influencing effectiveness of the initial energy of 50 J for Bi-DC of atrial fibrillation.
Evaluation of efficacy of 50 J shock of Bi-DC for restoration sinus rhythm and development of point score system to predict high conversion rate of 50 J shock in persistent atrial fibrillation.
The study group was composed of 502 consecutive Bi-DC in-patients with persistent atrial fibrillation who underwent cardioversion according to the standard protocol (50 J --> 1 J/kg m.c. --> 2 J/kg m.c. --> 200 J). Factors influencing effectiveness of 50 J shock were defined.
Rectilinear biphasic cardioversion of shock of 50 J was successful in 157 (31%) patients. In multivariate analysis independent factors associated with efficacy of 50 J shock were: atrial fibrillation duration < 7 months (OR: 14.3, CI: 5.83 - 35.2, p < 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction--LVEF > 40% (OR: 5.67, CI: 1.22 - 26.3, p = 0.027), body weight < 78 kg (OR: 3.17, CI: 1.52 - 6.59, p = 0.002), permanent pacemaker (OR: 2.98, CI: 1.20 - 7.40, p = 0.018), LA diameter < 4.5 cm (OR: 2.80, CI: 1.19 - 6.58, p = 0.02). A simplified point score system was developed to predict the chance for termination of atrial fibrillation (the score gives 5 points for atrial fibrillation duration < 7 months; 2 points for EF > 40%; 1 point for pacemaker, body weight < 78 kg and LA < 4.5 cm, each). High effectiveness (65%) of 50 J shock was achieved in patients with > 9 points of scoring system and 80% in this group when atrial fibrillation duration is shorter than 3 months. Effectiveness of 50 J shock was very low in the remaining group (0 points--0%; 1-3 points--5%; 4-6 points--21%; 7-8 points--34%, respectively).
The efficacy of initial shock of 50 J for termination of atrial fibrillation is limited and is not recommended for general population of patients with atrial fibrillation referred for Bi-DC. 50 J might be considered in patients with pacemakers without factors associated with failure of 50 J to terminate atrial fibrillation: atrial fibrillation duration > 7 months, lower LVEF increased LA diameter, body weight > 78 kg. The shock of 50 J is effective in more than 60% of patients, if they achieved 9 or 10 points in proposed score. The highest efficacy of 50 J shock (80%) is possible to reach in this group if atrial fibrillation duration is shorter than 3 months.
直线双相心脏复律(Bi-DC)已被证明对持续性心房颤动(AF)患者恢复窦性心律非常有效。然而,关于影响心房颤动Bi-DC初始能量50 J有效性的因素的信息有限。
评估Bi-DC 50 J电击恢复窦性心律的疗效,并建立评分系统以预测持续性心房颤动50 J电击的高转化率。
研究组由502例连续接受Bi-DC的持续性心房颤动住院患者组成,这些患者按照标准方案(50 J→1 J/kg体质量→2 J/kg体质量→200 J)进行心脏复律。确定了影响50 J电击有效性的因素。
50 J电击的直线双相心脏复律在157例(31%)患者中成功。多因素分析中,与50 J电击疗效相关的独立因素为:心房颤动持续时间<7个月(比值比:14.3,可信区间:5.83 - 35.2,p<0.001)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)>40%(比值比:5.67,可信区间:1.22 - 26.3,p = 0.027)、体质量<78 kg(比值比:3.17,可信区间:1.52 - 6.59,p = 0.002)、永久性起搏器(比值比:2.98,可信区间:1.20 - 7.40,p = 0.018)、左心房直径<4.5 cm(比值比:2.80,可信区间:1.19 - 6.58,p = 0.02)。建立了一个简化的评分系统来预测心房颤动终止的可能性(评分系统中,心房颤动持续时间<7个月得5分;LVEF>40%得2分;起搏器、体质量<78 kg和左心房<4.5 cm各得1分)。评分系统得分>9分的患者中50 J电击的高效性(65%)得以实现,当心房颤动持续时间短于3个月时,该组患者中50 J电击的有效性为80%。其余组中50 J电击的有效性非常低(0分——0%;1 - 3分——5%;4 - 6分——21%;7 - 8分——34%)。
心房颤动初始电击能量50 J终止心房颤动的疗效有限,不推荐用于接受Bi-DC的心房颤动患者总体人群。对于没有与50 J终止心房颤动失败相关因素(心房颤动持续时间>7个月、较低的LVEF、增大的左心房直径、体质量>78 kg)的起搏器患者,可以考虑使用50 J电击。如果患者在拟议的评分中获得9分或10分,50 J电击在超过60%的患者中有效。如果心房颤动持续时间短于3个月,该组中50 J电击最高疗效(80%)可能实现。