Pendyala L, Jabara R, Hou D, Shinke T, Li J, Gadesam R, Robinson K, Chronos N, Chen J P
Saint Joseph's Translational Research Institute, Saint Joseph's Hospital of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA 30342, USA.
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2008 Feb;56(1):89-105.
Although recent advances in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) have led to dramatic expansions in procedural complexity, bifurcation lesions (BL) remain a serious challenge for the interventionalist. Turbulent flow dynamics and high shear stress likely predispose coronary bifurcations to development of atherosclerotic plaques. These lesions comprise 15% to 20% of the total number of coronary interventions. When compared with non-BL interventions, BL interventions demonstrate lower procedural success rates, higher procedural costs, longer hospitalizations, and higher clinical and angiographic restenosis rates. The recent introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) has resulted in lower incidences of target lesion/ vessel revascularization and reduction of main branch restenosis in this anatomic subset, when compared to historical bare metal stent (BMS) controls. Nonetheless, DES have not resolved the bifurcation PCI problem; and several techniques employing either 1 or 2 stents have emerged. Stenting of the main vessel with provisional side branch stenting seems to be the prevailing approach. While no definitive single BL-PCI technique has been identified, the optimal approach is likely lesion-specific. This paper reviews different treatment modalities for this complex lesion subset, with particular emphasis on the use of DES, as well as new potential therapeutic approaches.
尽管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)近年来取得了进展,使得手术复杂性大幅增加,但分叉病变(BL)对于介入治疗医生来说仍然是一项严峻挑战。紊乱的血流动力学和高剪切应力可能使冠状动脉分叉处易于形成动脉粥样硬化斑块。这些病变占冠状动脉介入治疗总数的15%至20%。与非分叉病变介入治疗相比,分叉病变介入治疗的手术成功率较低、手术成本较高、住院时间较长,临床和血管造影再狭窄率也较高。与历史上的裸金属支架(BMS)对照相比,近期药物洗脱支架(DES)的引入已使该解剖亚组的靶病变/血管血运重建发生率降低,主支再狭窄减少。尽管如此,DES尚未解决分叉病变PCI问题;并且出现了几种采用单支架或双支架的技术。主血管置入支架并临时置入边支支架似乎是主流方法。虽然尚未确定明确的单一分叉病变PCI技术,但最佳方法可能因病变而异。本文综述了针对这一复杂病变亚组的不同治疗方式,特别强调了DES的使用以及新的潜在治疗方法。