Radiofrequency ablation with internally cooled versus perfused electrodes for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis.

PURPOSE

To compare the results of radiofrequency (RF) ablation with internally cooled electrodes (ICEs) versus perfused electrodes (PEs) in patients with cirrhosis with small (<or=3 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma ineligible for resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients treated with RF ablation over two consecutive periods were analyzed retrospectively. From 2000 to 2002, 45 patients were treated with 17-gauge ICEs, and from 2002 to 2004, 44 patients were treated with 15-gauge PEs. The two groups were similar in age, sex, Child-Pugh stage, serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level, and size and number of tumors (54 tumors in each group). Results were assessed by contrast medium-enhanced CT.

RESULTS

In both groups, 52 of 54 tumors (96.3%) were completely ablated. Eight of 54 tumors (14.8%) treated with ICEs and 39 of 54 tumors (72.2%) treated with PEs required multiple RF applications (P<.00005). In the respective groups, one of 54 tumors (1.8%) and seven of 54 tumors (12.9%) required multiple RF sessions (P=.03). Complication rates were similar. The 2-year probabilities of local and distant (ie, separated from the ablation zone) tumor progression in the ICE and PE groups were 11% and 15%, respectively (P=.65), and 31% and 64% (P=.01), respectively. On multivariate analysis, serum AFP level greater than 100 ng/mL (P=.006) and the use of a PE (P=.003) were risk factors for distant tumor progression.

CONCLUSIONS

RF ablation with the use of a PE requires more applications and sessions and is associated with a higher risk of distant tumor progression compared with the use of an ICE.