McDonald Mark W, Godette Karen D, Butker Elizabeth K, Davis Lawrence W, Johnstone Peter A S
Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Nov 15;72(4):1031-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.02.053. Epub 2008 Apr 25.
To evaluate long-term outcomes of adjuvant breast intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), with a comparison cohort receiving conventional radiation (cRT) during the same period.
Retrospective review identified patients with Stages 0-III breast cancer who underwent irradiation after conservative surgery from January 1999 to December 2003. Computed tomography simulation was used to design standard tangential breast fields with enhanced dynamic wedges for cRT and both enhanced dynamic wedges and dynamic multileaf collimators for IMRT. Patients received 1.8-2-Gy fractions to 44-50.4 Gy to the whole breast, followed by an electron boost of 10-20 Gy.
A total of 245 breasts were treated in 240 patients: 121 with IMRT and 124 with cRT. Median breast dose was 50 Gy, and median total dose was 60 Gy in both groups. Patient characteristics were well balanced between groups. Median follow-ups were 6.3 years (range, 3.7-104 months) for patients treated with IMRT and 7.5 years (range, 4.9-112 months) for those treated with cRT. Treatment with IMRT decreased acute skin toxicity of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 2 or 3 compared with cRT (39% vs. 52%; p = 0.047). For patients with Stages I-III (n = 199), 7-year Kaplan-Meier freedom from ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) rates were 95% for IMRT and 90% for cRT (p = 0.36). For patients with Stage 0 (ductal carcinoma in situ, n = 46), 7-year freedom from IBTR rates were 92% for IMRT and 81% for cRT (p = 0.29). Comparing IMRT with cRT, there were no statistically significant differences in overall survival, disease-specific survival, or freedom from IBTR, contralateral breast tumor recurrence, distant metastasis, late toxicity, or second malignancies.
Patients treated with breast IMRT had decreased acute skin toxicity, and long-term follow-up shows excellent local control similar to a contemporaneous cohort treated with cRT.
评估辅助性乳腺调强放射治疗(IMRT)的长期疗效,并与同期接受传统放射治疗(cRT)的队列进行比较。
回顾性研究纳入了1999年1月至2003年12月期间在保乳手术后接受放疗的0-III期乳腺癌患者。使用计算机断层扫描模拟为cRT设计标准切线乳腺野并辅以增强动态楔形板,为IMRT设计增强动态楔形板和动态多叶准直器。患者接受全乳1.8-2 Gy/次,共44-50.4 Gy,随后给予10-20 Gy的电子束加量。
240例患者共245个乳房接受治疗:121例接受IMRT,124例接受cRT。两组的中位乳腺剂量均为50 Gy,中位总剂量均为60 Gy。两组患者的特征均衡。接受IMRT治疗的患者中位随访时间为6.3年(范围3.7-104个月),接受cRT治疗的患者中位随访时间为7.5年(范围4.9-112个月)。与cRT相比,IMRT治疗可降低放射治疗肿瘤学组2级或3级急性皮肤毒性(39%对52%;p = 0.047)。对于I-III期患者(n = 199),IMRT组和cRT组的7年无同侧乳腺肿瘤复发(IBTR)率分别为95%和90%(p = 0.36)。对于0期患者(导管原位癌,n = 46),IMRT组和cRT组的7年无IBTR率分别为92%和81%(p = 0.29)。比较IMRT和cRT,在总生存、疾病特异性生存、无IBTR、对侧乳腺肿瘤复发、远处转移、晚期毒性或第二原发恶性肿瘤方面无统计学显著差异。
接受乳腺IMRT治疗的患者急性皮肤毒性降低,长期随访显示局部控制良好,与同期接受cRT治疗的队列相似。