Loulmet Didier F, Patel Nirav C, Jennings Joan M, Subramanian Valavanur A
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York 10075, USA.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 May;85(5):1551-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.01.071.
Aortic clamping and cardioplegia delivery add complexity to performing intracardiac procedures through a right minithoracotomy. Recent publications have shown excellent patient outcomes after mitral valve (MV) procedures undertaken through thoracotomy on the fibrillating heart. We reviewed our experience with this approach.
From March 2000 to September 2006, 100 patients underwent MV repair (n = 42), MV annuloplasty (n = 28), MV replacement (n = 18), atrial septal defect closure (n = 10), tricuspid valve repair (n = 1), and left atrial myxoma excision (n = 1). A modified maze procedure (n = 4) or left minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting (MIDCABG) (n = 2) was combined in six cases. The mean age was 57 +/- 11 years (range, 22 to 89); 27 patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV; 24 cases were first or second time reoperations; 20 patients had a left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 0.3. All the operations were carried out on the fibrillating heart without cross-clamping the aorta through a right minithoracotomy using peripheral cannulation.
Mean fibrillation time was 73 +/- 31 minutes (range, 10 to 198 minutes). There was no conversion to sternotomy. Postoperative inotropic support was needed in 20 cases. One patient who underwent a third time reoperation died within 30 days of mesenteric ischemia (hospital mortality = 1%). Complications were the following: four reoperations for bleeding (4%); two strokes (2%). Postoperative median hospital length of stay was five days (range, 2 to 58 days). None of the patients has required MV reoperation after hospital discharge. Follow-up was complete. All survivors were in NYHA class I or II.
Ventricular fibrillation simplifies less invasive intracardiac procedures and carries lower complication rates and perioperative mortality compared with conventional surgery.
主动脉阻断和心脏停搏液的输注增加了通过右胸小切口进行心内手术的复杂性。最近的出版物显示,在颤动心脏上通过开胸进行二尖瓣(MV)手术后患者预后良好。我们回顾了我们采用这种方法的经验。
从2000年3月至2006年9月,100例患者接受了二尖瓣修复(n = 42)、二尖瓣环成形术(n = 28)、二尖瓣置换术(n = 18)、房间隔缺损封堵术(n = 10)、三尖瓣修复术(n = 1)和左心房黏液瘤切除术(n = 1)。6例患者联合了改良迷宫手术(n = 4)或左微创直接冠状动脉旁路移植术(MIDCABG)(n = 2)。平均年龄为57±11岁(范围22至89岁);27例患者为纽约心脏协会(NYHA)III或IV级;24例为首次或二次再次手术;20例患者左心室射血分数小于0.3。所有手术均在颤动心脏上进行,通过右胸小切口采用外周插管法,未阻断主动脉。
平均颤动时间为73±31分钟(范围10至198分钟)。无一例转为胸骨正中切开术。20例患者术后需要使用正性肌力药物支持。1例接受第三次再次手术的患者在术后30天内因肠系膜缺血死亡(医院死亡率=1%)。并发症如下:4例因出血再次手术(4%);2例中风(2%)。术后中位住院时间为5天(范围2至58天)。出院后无患者需要再次进行二尖瓣手术。随访完整。所有存活患者均为NYHA I或II级。
与传统手术相比,心室颤动简化了微创心内手术,并发症发生率和围手术期死亡率更低。