Tomaske Maren, Gerritse Bart, Kretzers Leo, Pretre Rene, Dodge-Khatami Ali, Rahn Mariette, Bauersfeld Urs
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University Children's Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 May;85(5):1704-11. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.02.016.
Cardiovascular abnormalities and small vascular size may preclude transvenous pacing and necessitate epicardial lead implantation. This study evaluates the performance of steroid-eluting, bipolar epicardial pacing leads.
We prospectively enrolled 114 children with 239 atrial and ventricular bipolar epicardial leads (Medtronic CapSure 10366 or 4968, Minneapolis, MN), followed up to 12.2 years (median, 3.2). Lead data were obtained at implant and at semi-annual visits. Analysis was done for left or right atrial and ventricular leads.
Median atrial and ventricular pacing thresholds remained below 1.2 V at 0.5 ms. Thresholds did not differ between pacing sites: left atrial, 0.82 V at 0.5 ms; right atrial, 0.74 V at 0.5 ms (p = 0.85); and left ventricular, 0.96 V at 0.5 ms; right ventricular, 0.94 V at 0.5 ms (p = 0.65). Sensing demonstrated no difference for atrial leads, at left atrial, 3.4 mV; and right atrial, 2.9 mV (p = 0.12), but there was superiority of left over right ventricular leads (11.2 vs 7.7 mV, p = 0.002). During follow-up, the 239 atrial and ventricular leads experienced 19 (8%) lead failures. Lead survival at 2 and 5 years was 99% and 94% for atrial leads and 96% and 85% for ventricular leads, respectively.
Bipolar steroid-eluting epicardial leads demonstrate excellent sensing characteristics and persistent low median pacing thresholds below 1.2 V at 0.5 ms in children during up to 12 years follow-up. Considering growing and active patients with most having congenital heart disease, the lead survival of 85% to 94% at 5 years is favorable. Subanalysis shows superior sensing for left ventricular leads. Bipolar steroid-eluting leads provide an alternative approach for permanent pacing and may also be considered for left atrial and ventricular pacing, resynchronization, or defibrillator therapy.
心血管异常和血管尺寸较小可能会妨碍经静脉起搏,因此需要植入心外膜导线。本研究评估了类固醇洗脱双极心外膜起搏导线的性能。
我们前瞻性纳入了114名儿童,共植入239根心房和心室双极心外膜导线(美敦力CapSure 10366或4968,明尼阿波利斯,明尼苏达州),随访长达12.2年(中位数为3.2年)。在植入时和每半年随访时获取导线数据。对左或右心房及心室导线进行分析。
在0.5毫秒时,心房和心室起搏阈值中位数仍低于1.2伏。起搏部位之间的阈值无差异:左心房在0.5毫秒时为0.82伏;右心房在0.5毫秒时为0.74伏(p = 0.85);左心室在0.5毫秒时为0.96伏;右心室在0.5毫秒时为0.94伏(p = 0.65)。感知方面,心房导线无差异,左心房为3.4毫伏,右心房为2.9毫伏(p = 0.12),但左心室导线的感知优于右心室导线(11.2对7.7毫伏,p = 0.002)。在随访期间,239根心房和心室导线出现19次(8%)导线故障。心房导线在2年和5年时的导线生存率分别为99%和94%,心室导线分别为96%和85%。
双极类固醇洗脱心外膜导线在长达12年的随访中,在儿童中显示出优异的感知特性,且在0.5毫秒时起搏阈值中位数持续低于1.2伏。考虑到患者多为生长活跃且患有先天性心脏病,5年时85%至94%的导线生存率是良好的。亚组分析显示左心室导线的感知更佳。双极类固醇洗脱导线为永久性起搏提供了一种替代方法,也可考虑用于左心房和心室起搏、再同步化或除颤治疗。