Philipp Andrea M, Kalinich Claudia, Koch Iring, Schubotz Ricarda I
Department of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Jägerstrasse 17-19, 52066, Aachen, Germany.
Psychol Res. 2008 Jul;72(4):405-14. doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0150-x. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
Mixing costs and switch costs are two markers for the costs that arise in multitasking situations. To further explore mixing costs and switch costs, we used a serial prediction task in which subjects switched between stimulus dimensions (i.e., color, form, and position). Using this task, we demonstrate that both mixing costs and switch costs are influenced by task conflict and the resolution of interference. Here, we show that both mixing costs and switch costs are affected by a local factor, namely the necessity to resolve interference in the current trial in mixed blocks. However, whereas mixing costs can be sufficiently explained by interference resolution in the current trial, switch costs are also affected by carry-over effects from the preceding trial. As regards these carry-over effects, the present paradigm enabled us to demonstrate the influence of both persisting activation and persisting inhibition on the performance in switch trials.
混合成本和转换成本是多任务情境中产生的成本的两个指标。为了进一步探究混合成本和转换成本,我们使用了一个序列预测任务,在该任务中,受试者在刺激维度(即颜色、形状和位置)之间进行切换。通过这个任务,我们证明了混合成本和转换成本都受到任务冲突和干扰解决的影响。在这里,我们表明,混合成本和转换成本都受到一个局部因素的影响,即在混合块的当前试验中解决干扰的必要性。然而,虽然混合成本可以通过当前试验中的干扰解决得到充分解释,但转换成本也受到前一个试验的遗留效应的影响。关于这些遗留效应,当前的范式使我们能够证明持续激活和持续抑制对转换试验表现的影响。