Suppr超能文献

使用乘法模型评估生物等效性。

Assessment of bioequivalence using a multiplicative model.

作者信息

Chow S C, Peace K E, Shao J

机构信息

Biostatistics Department, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Plainsboro, New Jersey 08536.

出版信息

J Biopharm Stat. 1991;1(2):193-203. doi: 10.1080/10543409108835018.

Abstract

In many bioavailability/bioequivalence studies, the distributions of responses such as AUC and Cmax are often positively skewed and exhibit a lack of homogeneity of variances. In this situation, a logarithmic transformation is usually considered for reduction of skewness and achievement of an additive model with relatively homogeneous variance. In this paper, consideration is given to a multiplicative model based on empirical evidence. A method is proposed using individual subject ratios for assessing the bioequivalence of two different formulations. This method is then subsequently extended to several commonly used crossover experiments.

摘要

在许多生物利用度/生物等效性研究中,诸如AUC和Cmax等响应的分布通常呈正偏态,并且表现出方差缺乏齐性。在这种情况下,通常会考虑进行对数变换以减少偏度并实现具有相对齐性方差的加法模型。本文基于经验证据考虑了一个乘法模型。提出了一种使用个体受试者比率来评估两种不同制剂生物等效性的方法。该方法随后被扩展到几个常用的交叉试验。

相似文献

1
Assessment of bioequivalence using a multiplicative model.
J Biopharm Stat. 1991;1(2):193-203. doi: 10.1080/10543409108835018.
2
Bioequivalence and intrasubject variability.
J Biopharm Stat. 1991;1(2):205-19. doi: 10.1080/10543409108835019.
3
Average bioequivalence for two-sequence two-period crossover design with incomplete data.
J Biopharm Stat. 2005;15(5):857-67. doi: 10.1081/BIP-200067986.
4
A new approach for outliers in a bioavailability/bioequivalence study.
J Biopharm Stat. 2007;17(3):393-405. doi: 10.1080/10543400701199528.
5
On assessment of bioequivalence under a higher-order crossover design.
J Biopharm Stat. 1992;2(2):239-56. doi: 10.1080/10543409208835042.
7
Optimal sampling times in bioequivalence tests.
J Biopharm Stat. 2000 Feb;10(1):31-44. doi: 10.1081/BIP-100101011.
8
A three-step procedure for assessing bioequivalence in the general mixed model framework.
Stat Med. 1996 Dec 30;15(24):2635-55. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19961230)15:24<2635::AID-SIM444>3.0.CO;2-X.
9
Extension to the use of tolerance intervals for the assessment of individual bioequivalence.
J Biopharm Stat. 1994 Mar;4(1):39-52. doi: 10.1080/10543409408835071.
10
On TIER method for assessment of individual bioequivalence.
J Biopharm Stat. 1997 Mar;7(1):63-85. doi: 10.1080/10543409708835170.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验