Léger Jean-Marc, Viala Karine, Maisonobe Thierry, Bouche Pierre
Centre de Référence Maladies Neuromusculaires rares Paris Est Bâtiment Babinski, Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, 47 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651 Paris cedex 13.
Bull Acad Natl Med. 2007 Oct;191(7):1395-407; discussion 1407-9.
Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) was first distinguished from other motor neuropathies in 1986. It is characterised by slowly progressive predominantly distal and asymmetric limb weakness and wasting that predominates in the arms, with muscle cramps and fasciculations, within an anatomical distribution of individual motor nerves. Sensory involvement is minimal or absent. The electrodiagnostic hallmark is focal motor conduction block (CB), persisting for years at atypical sites. The most typical laboratory finding is increased serum IgM autoantibody titers to the ganglioside GM1. High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is currently the gold-standard treatment for MMN. To document short-term and long-term responses to IVIg, we conducted a retrospective study of 40 patients with MMN defined using ENMC Workshop criteria and treated with periodic IVIg infusions (Tégéline) between 1995 and 2003. For the short-term analysis we compared the 22 patients who had never previously received IVIg with the 18 IVIg-experienced patients. For the long-term evaluation (> 6 months), the patients were classified into four groups according to their dependence on periodic IVIg. The MRC score improved significantly in 14 (70% ; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.88) of the 20 assessable treatment-naive patients (data were missing for two patients). This rate was significantly higher than at six months in a historical group of placebo-treated patients (20%; p < 0.0001). No criteria predictive of the response were identified. At the end of follow-up (mean 2.2 +/- 2.0 years) only 8 patients (22%) in the cohort remained in remission after a good initial response to IVIg, while 25 patients (68%) were dependent on periodic IVIg infusions. This study confirms the good short-term response of MMN to IVIg but indicates that the longer-term results are variable. New therapeutic strategies are required to increase the short-term and long-term efficacy of IVIg, and to reduce reliance on this treatment.
多灶性运动神经病(MMN)于1986年首次从其他运动神经病中区分出来。其特征为缓慢进展的、主要累及远端且不对称的肢体无力和萎缩,以手臂为主,伴有肌肉痉挛和肌束震颤,局限于单个运动神经的解剖分布范围内。感觉受累轻微或无受累。电诊断的特征性表现是局灶性运动传导阻滞(CB),在非典型部位持续数年。最典型的实验室检查结果是血清抗神经节苷脂GM1 IgM自身抗体滴度升高。高剂量静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIg)目前是MMN的金标准治疗方法。为记录对IVIg的短期和长期反应,我们对40例符合欧洲神经肌肉中心(ENMC)研讨会标准定义且在1995年至2003年间接受定期IVIg输注(特杰林)治疗的MMN患者进行了一项回顾性研究。在短期分析中,我们将22例从未接受过IVIg治疗的患者与18例有IVIg治疗经验的患者进行了比较。在长期评估(>6个月)中,根据患者对定期IVIg的依赖程度将患者分为四组。在20例可评估的未接受过治疗的患者中,14例(70%;95%可信区间0.46至0.88)的医学研究委员会(MRC)评分显著改善(有2例患者数据缺失)。该改善率显著高于历史上接受安慰剂治疗患者组在6个月时的改善率(20%;p<0.0001)。未发现预测反应的标准。在随访结束时(平均2.2±2.0年),队列中仅有8例患者(22%)在对IVIg有良好初始反应后仍处于缓解状态,而25例患者(68%)依赖定期IVIg输注。本研究证实了MMN对IVIg有良好的短期反应,但表明长期结果存在差异。需要新的治疗策略来提高IVIg的短期和长期疗效,并减少对这种治疗的依赖。