Suppr超能文献

贝内特角。不同记录方法的临床比较。

The Bennett angle. Clinical comparison of different recording methods.

作者信息

Boulos Paul J, Adib Salim M, Naltchayan Levon J

机构信息

Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, St. Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

N Y State Dent J. 2008 Mar;74(2):34-8.

Abstract

The use of interocclusal records with semi-adjustable articulators has been proposed as an easier alternative to axiograph. The operator measured the Bennett angle of 30 participants using an axiograph Quick-Axis, an arcon Whip-Mix and non-arcon Dentatus articulators. Wax and polyether interocclusal recording materials were used with both types of articulators. Compared to the reference axiograph, the Whip-Mix plus wax combination was the nearest one and the Dentatus plus polyether was the most significantly different combination.

摘要

有人提出使用带有半可调牙合架的牙合记录作为一种比轴面描记仪更简便的替代方法。操作人员使用轴面描记仪Quick-Axis、Arcon型Whip-Mix牙合架和Non-Arcon型Dentatus牙合架测量了30名参与者的 Bennett 角。两种牙合架均使用了蜡和聚醚牙合记录材料。与参考轴面描记仪相比,Whip-Mix牙合架加蜡的组合最接近,而Dentatus牙合架加聚醚的组合差异最为显著。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验