Suppr超能文献

克拉霉素治疗稳定型冠心病2周:CLARICOR随机试验的6年随访及冠心病抗生素治疗的更新荟萃分析

Clarithromycin for 2 weeks for stable coronary heart disease: 6-year follow-up of the CLARICOR randomized trial and updated meta-analysis of antibiotics for coronary heart disease.

作者信息

Gluud Christian, Als-Nielsen Bodil, Damgaard Morten, Fischer Hansen Jørgen, Hansen Stig, Helø Olav H, Hildebrandt Per, Hilden Jørgen, Jensen Gorm Boje, Kastrup Jens, Kolmos Hans Jørn, Kjøller Erik, Lind Inga, Nielsen Henrik, Petersen Lars, Jespersen Christian M

机构信息

The Copenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Cardiology. 2008;111(4):280-7. doi: 10.1159/000128994. Epub 2008 May 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We have reported increased 2.6-year mortality in clarithromycin- versus placebo-exposed stable coronary heart disease patients, but meta-analysis of randomized trials in coronary heart disease patients showed no significant effect of antibiotics on mortality. Here we report the 6-year mortality of clarithromycin- versus placebo-exposed patients and updated meta-analyses.

METHODS

Centrally randomized, placebo controlled multicenter trial. All parties were blinded. Analyses were by intention to treat. Meta-analyses followed the Cochrane Collaboration methodology.

RESULTS

We randomized 4,372 patients with stable coronary heart disease to clarithromycin 500 mg (n = 2,172) or placebo (n = 2,200) once daily for 2 weeks. Mortality was followed through public register. Nine hundred and twenty-three patients (21.1%) died. Six-year mortality was significantly higher in the clarithromycin group (hazard ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.06-1.38). Adjustment for entry characteristics (sex, age, prior myocardial infarction, center, and smoking) did not change the results (1.18, 1.04-1.35). Addition of our data to that of other randomized trials on antibiotics for patients with coronary heart disease versus placebo/no intervention (17 trials, 25,271 patients, 1,877 deaths) showed a significantly increased relative risk of death from antibiotics of 1.10 (1.01-1.20) without heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results stress the necessity to consider carefully the strength of the indication before administering antibiotics to patients with coronary heart disease.

摘要

目的

我们曾报道,与服用安慰剂的稳定型冠心病患者相比,服用克拉霉素的患者2.6年死亡率有所增加,但对冠心病患者随机试验的荟萃分析表明,抗生素对死亡率无显著影响。在此,我们报告服用克拉霉素与服用安慰剂患者的6年死亡率,并更新荟萃分析。

方法

进行中心随机、安慰剂对照的多中心试验。所有参与方均为盲法。分析采用意向性治疗。荟萃分析遵循Cochrane协作组方法。

结果

我们将4372例稳定型冠心病患者随机分为两组,一组每日服用一次500毫克克拉霉素(n = 2172),另一组服用安慰剂(n = 2200),为期2周。通过公共登记系统跟踪死亡率。923例患者(21.1%)死亡。克拉霉素组的6年死亡率显著更高(风险比1.21,95%置信区间1.06 - 1.38)。对入组特征(性别、年龄、既往心肌梗死、中心和吸烟情况)进行调整后,结果未改变(1.18,1.04 - 1.35)。将我们的数据与其他关于冠心病患者使用抗生素与安慰剂/无干预的随机试验数据(17项试验,25271例患者,1877例死亡)合并分析显示,抗生素导致的死亡相对风险显著增加至1.10(1.01 - 1.20),且无异质性。

结论

我们的结果强调,在对冠心病患者使用抗生素之前,必须仔细考虑用药指征的强度。

相似文献

10
Circulating endostatin as a risk factor for cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary heart disease: A CLARICOR trial sub-study.
Atherosclerosis. 2019 May;284:202-208. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.02.031. Epub 2019 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

3
predictions of drug-induced changes in human cardiac contractility align with experimental recordings.
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Mar 17;16:1500668. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1500668. eCollection 2025.
4
Antibiotics for the Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease.
Br J Card Nurs. 2022 Oct 2;17(10):1-7. doi: 10.12968/bjca.2022.0082.
5
Managing Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps in the Elderly: Challenges and Solutions.
Clin Interv Aging. 2022 May 2;17:685-698. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S279765. eCollection 2022.
6
Antibiotics for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 23;2(2):CD003610. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003610.pub4.
7
Effect of Helicobacter pylori treatment on the long-term mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Korean J Intern Med. 2021 May;36(3):584-595. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2019.428. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
9
Treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: an official ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA clinical practice guideline.
Eur Respir J. 2020 Jul 7;56(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00535-2020. Print 2020 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Antibiotics for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 23;2(2):CD003610. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003610.pub4.
2
Problems with use of composite end points in cardiovascular trials: systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
BMJ. 2007 Apr 14;334(7597):786. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39136.682083.AE. Epub 2007 Apr 2.
5
Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research.
JAMA. 2005 Jul 13;294(2):218-28. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.2.218.
7
Antibiotic treatment of Chlamydia pneumoniae after acute coronary syndrome.
N Engl J Med. 2005 Apr 21;352(16):1646-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043528.
8
Azithromycin for the secondary prevention of coronary events.
N Engl J Med. 2005 Apr 21;352(16):1637-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043526.
9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验