Hautekiet Veerle, Geert Verbeke, Marc Vandebroeck, Rony Geers
Laboratory for Quality Care in Animal Production, KU Leuven, Bijzondere Weg 12, Lovenjoel, Belgium.
Prev Vet Med. 2008 Aug 15;86(1-2):75-92. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.03.005. Epub 2008 May 2.
The aim of this study was to develop a scientifically based Sanitary Risk Index (SRI), defined as an objective measure of the Salmonella seroprevalence in a pig herd based on the risk factors being present on the farm. Therefore, an observational epidemiological study was adopted to infer risk factors for the Salmonella seroprevalence of market pigs. A total of 204 Belgian farrow-to-finish pig herds were included in this cross-sectional study. The antibody titre to Salmonella in sera was analysed by means of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for an average of 58 finisher pigs on each farm. A detailed questionnaire, covering an extensive range of potential risk factors was completed by each participating pig producer. Pearson correlation coefficients between the average sample to positive ratio (S/P)-value of a herd and the within-herd proportion of seropositive pigs were high. Significant risk factors associated with the average S/P-value of a herd were identified by a general linear mixed model. Feeding of meal, providing wet feed, having a hygienic-lock facility, using boot baths, applying the strict all in/all out procedure, programming the temperature in the zone of thermal neutrality and disinfecting between batches were all associated with lower average S/P-values. Sampling in summer, using a clean downtime, decreasing floor space per animal as well as increasing herd size were related with higher average S/P-values. The SRI consists of the above-specified risk factors together with their relative weight. Determining the Salmonella risk of a new herd by the SRI is primarily based on the quantification of the farm specific risk factors present and results in an average S/P-value of the herd. The model was validated using a set of conventional farms. In conclusion, the SRI is a useful preliminary screening tool which forms the basis for targeted sampling but cannot replace the serological herd classification with regard to Salmonella prevalence.
本研究的目的是开发一种基于科学的卫生风险指数(SRI),该指数被定义为基于猪场存在的风险因素对猪群中沙门氏菌血清阳性率的客观测量。因此,采用观察性流行病学研究来推断市场猪沙门氏菌血清阳性率的风险因素。本横断面研究共纳入了204个比利时从产仔到育肥的猪群。通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)分析每个猪场平均58头育肥猪血清中沙门氏菌的抗体滴度。每个参与的养猪生产者都完成了一份涵盖广泛潜在风险因素的详细问卷。猪群平均样本阳性率(S/P)值与猪群内血清阳性猪的比例之间的Pearson相关系数很高。通过一般线性混合模型确定了与猪群平均S/P值相关的显著风险因素。饲喂粉料、提供湿料、设有卫生锁设施、使用靴浴、采用严格的全进全出程序、将温度设定在热中性区以及批次间消毒均与较低的平均S/P值相关。夏季采样、使用清洁空栏期、减少每头动物的占地面积以及增加猪群规模与较高的平均S/P值相关。SRI由上述特定风险因素及其相对权重组成。通过SRI确定新猪群的沙门氏菌风险主要基于对猪场存在的特定风险因素的量化,并得出猪群的平均S/P值。该模型使用一组传统猪场进行了验证。总之,SRI是一种有用的初步筛查工具,它构成了针对性采样的基础,但在沙门氏菌流行率方面不能取代血清学猪群分类。