Marschark Marc, Sapere Patricia, Convertino Carol, Pelz Jeff
National Technical Institute for the Deaf, Rochester Institute of Technology, Center for Education Research Partnerships, Rochester, NY 14623, USA.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2008 Fall;13(4):546-61. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enn014. Epub 2008 May 3.
Four experiments investigated classroom learning by deaf college students receiving lectures from instructors signing for themselves or using interpreters. Deaf students' prior content knowledge, scores on postlecture assessments of content learning, and gain scores were compared to those of hearing classmates. Consistent with prior research, deaf students, on average, came into and left the classroom with less content knowledge than hearing peers, and use of simultaneous communication (sign and speech together) and American Sign Language (ASL) apparently were equally effective for deaf students' learning of the material. Students' self-rated sign language skills were not significantly related to performance. Two new findings were of particular importance. First, direct and mediated instruction (via interpreting) were equally effective for deaf college students under the several conditions employed here. Second, despite coming into the classroom with the disadvantage of having less content knowledge, deaf students' gain scores generally did not differ from those of their hearing peers. Possible explanations for these findings are considered.
四项实验研究了聋人大学生在课堂上的学习情况,这些学生接受的讲座来自于为自己打手语的教师或使用口译员的教师。将聋人学生先前的内容知识、讲座后内容学习评估的分数以及成绩提高分数与听力正常的同学进行了比较。与先前的研究一致,平均而言,聋人学生进入和离开教室时所掌握的内容知识比听力正常的同龄人少,同时使用交流方式(手语和口语同时进行)和美国手语(ASL)对聋人学生学习材料的效果显然是一样的。学生的自评手语技能与学习表现没有显著关系。有两个新发现尤为重要。第一,在这里所采用的几种条件下,直接教学和间接教学(通过口译)对聋人大学生同样有效。第二,尽管聋人学生进入教室时存在内容知识较少的劣势,但他们的成绩提高分数通常与听力正常的同龄人没有差异。文中考虑了这些发现的可能解释。