Suppr超能文献

聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a与利巴韦林治疗丙型肝炎病毒2/3型慢性感染12周或24周的随机对照研究

Randomized comparison of 12 or 24 weeks of peginterferon alpha-2a and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 2/3 infection.

作者信息

Lagging Martin, Langeland Nina, Pedersen Court, Färkkilä Martti, Buhl Mads Rauning, Mørch Kristine, Dhillon Amar P, Alsiö Asa, Hellstrand Kristoffer, Westin Johan, Norkrans Gunnar

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

Hepatology. 2008 Jun;47(6):1837-45. doi: 10.1002/hep.22253.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Previous trials investigating the efficacy of treatment durations shorter than the standard of 24 weeks for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2/3 infections have yielded discordant results. The aims of this investigator-initiated phase III study were to compare the efficacy of 12 or 24 weeks of treatment and to identify patients suitable for short-term therapy. Three hundred eighty-two genotype 2/3-infected patients [intention-to-treat (ITT) population] at 31 centers in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden were randomized to 12 or 24 weeks of peginterferon alpha-2a (180 microg/week) plus ribavirin (800 mg/day). Twelve weeks of therapy was inferior to 24 weeks in the ITT population (sustained viral response [SVR] rates: 59% versus 78%, P < 0.0001) and in the subgroups of patients infected with genotype 2 (56% versus 82%, P = 0.006) or 3 (58% versus 78%, P = 0.0015). These differences were observed regardless of the fibrosis stage. Age and HCV-RNA levels on days 7 and 29 were independent predictors of SVR. Short-term treatment was useful in patients < 40 years old, especially if HCV-RNA was undetectable on day 29, and also in patients > or = 40 years old, provided that HCV-RNA was below 1000 IU/mL on day 7 in addition to being undetectable on day 29. If neither of these two criteria were met for patients > or = 40 years old, 24 weeks of therapy was superior (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Peginterferon/ribavirin treatment for 12 weeks in HCV genotype 2/3 infection is overall inferior to 24 weeks of treatment but may be useful in some patients with a rapid initial clearance of virus.

摘要

未标记

先前关于慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)2/3型感染治疗疗程短于标准的24周疗效的试验结果不一。这项由研究者发起的III期研究旨在比较12周或24周治疗的疗效,并确定适合短期治疗的患者。丹麦、芬兰、挪威和瑞典31个中心的382例2/3型感染患者(意向性治疗[ITT]人群)被随机分为接受12周或24周的聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a(180微克/周)加利巴韦林(800毫克/天)治疗。在ITT人群中,12周治疗劣于24周治疗(持续病毒学应答[SVR]率:59%对78%,P<0.0001),在2型感染患者亚组(56%对82%,P = 0.006)或3型感染患者亚组(58%对78%,P = 0.0015)中也是如此。无论纤维化阶段如何,均观察到这些差异。年龄以及第7天和第29天的HCV-RNA水平是SVR的独立预测因素。短期治疗对年龄<40岁的患者有用,尤其是如果第29天HCV-RNA检测不到的话;对年龄≥40岁的患者也有用,前提是第7天HCV-RNA低于1000 IU/mL且第29天检测不到。如果年龄≥40岁的患者这两个标准均未满足,则24周治疗更优(P<0.0001)。

结论

HCV 2/3型感染采用聚乙二醇干扰素/利巴韦林治疗12周总体上劣于24周治疗,但对一些病毒初始清除迅速的患者可能有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验