Suppr超能文献

循证影像学指南与医疗保险支付政策。

Evidence-based imaging guidelines and Medicare payment policy.

作者信息

Sistrom Christopher L, McKay Niccie L

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Florida School of Medicine, PO Box 100374, Gainesville, FL 32610-0374, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2008 Jun;43(3):1006-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00802.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study examines the relationship between evidence-based appropriateness criteria for neurologic imaging procedures and Medicare payment determinations. The primary research question is whether Medicare is more likely to pay for imaging procedures as the level of appropriateness increases.

DATA SOURCES

The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria (ACRAC) for neurological imaging, ICD-9-CM codes, CPT codes, and payment determinations by the Medicare Part B carrier for Florida and Connecticut.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study of appropriateness criteria and Medicare Part B payment policy for neurological imaging. In addition to descriptive and bivariate statistics, multivariate logistic regression on payment determination (yes or no) was performed.

DATA COLLECTION METHODS

The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria (ACRAC) documents specific to neurological imaging, ICD-9-CM codes, and CPT codes were used to create 2,510 medical condition/imaging procedure combinations, with associated appropriateness scores (coded as low/middle/high).

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

As the level of appropriateness increased, more medical condition/imaging procedure combinations were payable (low = 61 percent, middle = 70 percent, and high = 74 percent). Logistic regression indicated that the odds of a medical condition/imaging procedure combination with a middle level of appropriateness being payable was 48 percent higher than for an otherwise similar combination with a low appropriateness score (95 percent CI on odds ratio=1.19-1.84). The odds ratio for being payable between high and low levels of appropriateness was 2.25 (95 percent CI: 1.66-3.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Medicare could improve its payment determinations by taking advantage of existing clinical guidelines, appropriateness criteria, and other authoritative resources for evidence-based practice. Such an approach would give providers a financial incentive that is aligned with best-practice medicine. In particular, Medicare should review and update its payment policies to reflect current information on the appropriateness of alternative imaging procedures for the same medical condition.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨神经影像学检查的循证适用性标准与医疗保险支付决定之间的关系。主要研究问题是随着适用性水平的提高,医疗保险是否更有可能为影像学检查支付费用。

数据来源

美国放射学会神经影像学适用性标准(ACRAC)、ICD-9-CM编码、CPT编码以及医疗保险B部分承保机构对佛罗里达州和康涅狄格州的支付决定。

研究设计

关于神经影像学适用性标准和医疗保险B部分支付政策的横断面研究。除了描述性和双变量统计外,还对支付决定(是或否)进行了多变量逻辑回归分析。

数据收集方法

使用美国放射学会特定于神经影像学的适用性标准文件、ICD-9-CM编码和CPT编码,创建了2510种医疗状况/影像学检查组合,并给出了相应的适用性评分(编码为低/中/高)。

主要发现

随着适用性水平的提高,更多的医疗状况/影像学检查组合可以获得支付(低适用性:61%,中等适用性:70%,高适用性:74%)。逻辑回归表明,适用性中等的医疗状况/影像学检查组合获得支付的几率比适用性低的类似组合高48%(优势比的95%置信区间=1.19-1.84)。高适用性和低适用性水平之间获得支付的优势比为2.25(95%置信区间:1.66-3.04)。

结论

医疗保险可以利用现有的临床指南、适用性标准和其他循证实践的权威资源来改进其支付决定。这种方法将为医疗服务提供者提供与最佳医疗实践相一致的经济激励。特别是,医疗保险应审查和更新其支付政策,以反映关于同一医疗状况下替代影像学检查适用性的当前信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验