Ranque Brigitte, Alter Andrea, Schurr Erwin, Abel Laurent, Alcais Alexandre
Laboratoire de génétique humaine des maladies infectieuses, Inserm U550, Paris, France.
Med Sci (Paris). 2008 May;24(5):491-7. doi: 10.1051/medsci/2008245491.
Fifty years ago, the first identification of a non Mendelian genetic contribution to the development of a common infectious disease, i.e. the association between malaria and sickle-cell trait, was shown using a supervised approach which tests a limited number of candidate genes selected by hypothesis. Since then, the few genes that were convincingly associated with susceptibility to human infectious diseases were identified following the same strategy. The study of leprosy has contributed to modifying this way of thinking. In the absence of a satisfying experimental model and because of the impossibility to grow the causative agent in vitro, the candidate gene approach has turned out to be of limited interest. Conversely, positional cloning led to the identification of two major genes involved in the control of the disease, establishing for the first time the oligogenic nature of a human genetic contribution to an infectious disease. It is likely that these major results obtained in leprosy and the recent burst of genomic tools will make the genome-wide screening (functional or positional) the main strategy of dissection of the genetic susceptibility to many common infectious diseases.
五十年前,首次发现一种常见传染病的发展存在非孟德尔遗传贡献,即疟疾与镰状细胞性状之间的关联,这是通过一种监督方法实现的,该方法测试了由假设选定的有限数量的候选基因。从那时起,通过相同策略确定了少数几个与人类传染病易感性有令人信服关联的基因。麻风病研究促使这种思维方式发生了改变。由于缺乏令人满意的实验模型,且无法在体外培养病原体,候选基因方法的价值有限。相反,定位克隆导致发现了两个参与疾病控制的主要基因,首次确立了人类对传染病遗传贡献的寡基因性质。在麻风病研究中取得的这些主要成果以及近期基因组工具的大量涌现,很可能会使全基因组筛查(功能或定位)成为剖析许多常见传染病遗传易感性的主要策略。