Martin C, Rouel J, Jouany J P, Doreau M, Chilliard Y
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, UR1213 Herbivores, F63122 Saint-Genès Champanelle, France.
J Anim Sci. 2008 Oct;86(10):2642-50. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0774. Epub 2008 May 9.
This experiment studied the effect of 3 forms of presentation of linseed fatty acids (FA) on methane output using the sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique, total tract digestibility, and performance of dairy cows. Eight multiparous lactating Holstein cows (initial milk yield 23.4 +/- 2.2 kg/d) were assigned to 4 dietary treatments in a replicated 4 x 4 Latin square design: a control diet (C) consisting of corn silage (59%), grass hay (6%), and concentrate (35%) and the same diet with crude linseed (CLS), extruded linseed (ELS), or linseed oil (LSO) at the same FA level (5.7% of dietary DM). Each experimental period lasted 4 wk. All the forms of linseed FA significantly decreased daily CH(4) emissions (P < 0.001) but to different extents (-12% with CLS, -38% with ELS, -64% with LSO) compared with C. The same ranking among diets was observed for CH(4) output expressed as a percentage of energy intake (P < 0.001) or in grams per kilogram of OM intake (P < 0.001). Methane production per unit of digested NDF was similar for C, CLS, and ELS but was less for LSO (138 vs. 68 g/kg of digested NDF, respectively; P < 0.001). Measured as grams per kilogram of milk or fat-corrected milk yield, methane emission was similar for C and CLS and was less for ELS and LSO (P < 0.001), LSO being less than ELS (P < 0.01). Total tract NDF digestibility was significantly less (P < 0.001) for the 3 supplemented diets than for C (-6.8% on average; P < 0.001). Starch digestibility was similar for all diets (mean 93.5%). Compared with C, DMI was not modified with CLS (P > 0.05) but was decreased with ELS and LSO (-3.1 and -5.1 kg/d, respectively; P < 0.001). Milk yield and milk fat content were similar for LSO and ELS but less than for C and CLS (19.9 vs. 22.3 kg/d and 33.8 vs. 43.2 g/kg, on average, respectively; P < 0.01 and P < 0.001). Linseed FA offer a promising dietary means to depress ruminal methanogenesis. The form of presentation of linseed FA greatly influences methane output from dairy cows. The negative effects of linseed on milk production will need to be overcome if it is to be considered as a methane mitigation agent. Optimal conditions for the utilization of linseed FA in ruminant diets need to be determined before recommending its use for the dairy industry.
本实验采用六氟化硫示踪技术,研究了亚麻籽脂肪酸(FA)的3种呈现形式对奶牛甲烷排放、全消化道消化率及生产性能的影响。选用8头经产泌乳荷斯坦奶牛(初始产奶量23.4±2.2 kg/d),采用重复4×4拉丁方设计,分为4种日粮处理:对照日粮(C),由玉米青贮(59%)、禾本科干草(6%)和精料(35%)组成;以及在相同FA水平(占日粮干物质的5.7%)下添加生亚麻籽(CLS)、挤压亚麻籽(ELS)或亚麻籽油(LSO)的相同日粮。每个试验期持续4周。与对照日粮相比,所有形式的亚麻籽FA均显著降低了每日甲烷排放量(P<0.001),但降低程度不同(CLS降低12%,ELS降低38%,LSO降低64%)。以能量摄入量的百分比(P<0.001)或每千克有机物质摄入量的克数(P<0.001)表示的甲烷排放量,各日粮间的排序相同。单位消化中性洗涤纤维的甲烷产量,对照日粮、CLS和ELS相似,但LSO较低(分别为138和68 g/kg消化中性洗涤纤维;P<0.001)。以每千克牛奶或校正乳产量的克数衡量,对照日粮和CLS的甲烷排放量相似,ELS和LSO较低(P<0.001),LSO低于ELS(P<0.01)。3种添加日粮的全消化道中性洗涤纤维消化率显著低于对照日粮(平均低6.8%;P<0.001)。所有日粮的淀粉消化率相似(平均93.5%)。与对照日粮相比,CLS对干物质采食量(DMI)无影响(P>0.05),但ELS和LSO使其降低(分别降低3.1和5.1 kg/d;P<0.001)。LSO和ELS的产奶量和乳脂率相似,但低于对照日粮和CLS(平均分别为19.9 vs. 22.3 kg/d和33.8 vs. 43.2 g/kg;P<0.01和P<0.001)。亚麻籽FA为降低瘤胃甲烷生成提供了一种有前景的日粮手段。亚麻籽FA的呈现形式对奶牛甲烷排放有很大影响。若将亚麻籽视为甲烷减排剂,则需克服其对牛奶生产的负面影响。在推荐将其用于奶牛业之前,需要确定反刍动物日粮中利用亚麻籽FA的最佳条件。