Suppr超能文献

每周一次与每周两次或三次皮下注射促红细胞生成素α的比较:一项随机对照多中心研究的结果

A comparison between once-weekly and twice- or thrice-weekly subcutaneous injection of epoetin alfa: results from a randomized controlled multicentre study.

作者信息

Lee Young Ki, Kim Sung Gyun, Seo Jang Won, Oh Ji Eun, Yoon Jong-Woo, Koo Ja-Ryong, Kim Hyung Jik, Noh Jung Woo

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym Kidney Research Institute, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 Oct;23(10):3240-6. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn255. Epub 2008 May 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In patients with chronic renal failure, the ability to reduce the administration frequency of subcutaneous (SC) erythropoietin (epoetin) could provide benefits and may improve compliance. The study investigated whether once-weekly SC epoetin alfa was equivalent to twice- or thrice-weekly SC administration in maintaining anaemia correction in haemodialysis patients.

METHODS

Eighty-three patients were randomly assigned to either once-weekly epoetin alfa (n = 44) or their original dose twice- or thrice-weekly regimen (control, n = 39) for 12 weeks. The haemoglobin concentration was maintained within the target range of 9.0-12.0 g/dL by adjusting the dose of epoetin alfa. All patients received intravenous iron supplementation, as required.

RESULTS

Stable haemoglobin levels were maintained without epoetin dose increases in the majority of patients in both groups (once-weekly group, 95.0%, control group, 91.4%). The mean haemoglobin levels at randomization at weeks 4, 8 and 12 were 10.7, 11.1, 11.3 and 11.0 g/dL, respectively, in the once-weekly group, and 10.5, 11.3, 11.5 and 11.3 g/dL, respectively, in the control group. The mean weekly dose of epoetin alfa at randomization at weeks 4, 8 and 12 was 142.8, 114.5, 108.6 and 104.5 IU/kg, respectively, in the once-weekly group, and 128.4, 116.0, 101.0 and 96.1 IU/kg/week, respectively, in the control group. No statistically significant between-group differences were apparent for changes in haemoglobin levels or epoetin alfa dosages at week 12.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that once-weekly SC administration of epoetin alfa is as effective and safe as two or three times weekly administration in maintaining haemoglobin levels. Therefore, the once-weekly therapy using high dose of epoetin alfa is considered to be an efficient method in stable haemodialysis patients.

摘要

背景

在慢性肾衰竭患者中,降低皮下注射促红细胞生成素(依泊汀)的给药频率可能有益,并可能提高依从性。本研究调查了每周一次皮下注射阿法依泊汀在维持血液透析患者贫血纠正方面是否等同于每周两次或三次皮下注射。

方法

83例患者被随机分为每周一次阿法依泊汀组(n = 44)或其原剂量每周两次或三次方案组(对照组,n = 39),为期12周。通过调整阿法依泊汀剂量,将血红蛋白浓度维持在9.0 - 12.0 g/dL的目标范围内。所有患者根据需要接受静脉补铁。

结果

两组大多数患者在不增加依泊汀剂量的情况下维持了稳定的血红蛋白水平(每周一次组为95.0%,对照组为91.4%)。每周一次组在第4、8和12周随机分组时的平均血红蛋白水平分别为10.7、11.1、11.3和11.0 g/dL,对照组分别为10.5、11.3、11.5和11.3 g/dL。每周一次组在第4、8和12周随机分组时阿法依泊汀的平均每周剂量分别为142.8、114.5、108.6和104.5 IU/kg,对照组分别为128.4、116.0、101.0和96.1 IU/kg/周。在第12周时,血红蛋白水平或阿法依泊汀剂量的组间变化无统计学显著差异。

结论

本研究表明,每周一次皮下注射阿法依泊汀在维持血红蛋白水平方面与每周两次或三次注射同样有效且安全。因此,对于稳定的血液透析患者,使用高剂量阿法依泊汀的每周一次疗法被认为是一种有效的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验