• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对私人助听器经销商直接提供助听器的偏好:一项离散选择实验。

Patient preferences for direct hearing aid provision by a private dispenser. A discrete choice experiment.

作者信息

Grutters Janneke P C, Joore Manuela A, Kessels Alfons G H, Davis Adrian C, Anteunis Lucien J C

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2008 Aug;29(4):557-64. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181734a19.

DOI:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181734a19
PMID:18469716
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to elicit patient preferences for transferring elements of hearing aid provision from the medical sector [Ear Nose and Throat (ENT) specialists and audiological centers] to private hearing aid dispensers, and to understand the trade-offs between different elements of hearing aid provision.

DESIGN

A discrete choice experiment was administered from 150 hearing-impaired persons in the Netherlands. Mean age was 71 (range 18-95) and 57% were male.

RESULTS

Participants preferred the initial assessment at the dispenser, higher accuracy in identifying persons in need of medical care, shorter duration of the total hearing aid provision, and a follow-up at the ENT specialist. They required compensation of at least euro 17 per 2 mo extra duration, euro 54 for an initial assessment at the ENT specialist, euro 119 per 10% decrease in accuracy, and euro 227 to forgo the follow-up at the ENT specialist. Preferences were influenced by sex, age, educational level, and experience with hearing aid provision.

CONCLUSIONS

Hearing-impaired persons are receptive to transferring elements of hearing aid provision from the medical sector to private dispensers. Although safety and efficiency issues should also be considered, from the present study we can conclude that in the organization of hearing aid provision hearing-impaired persons prefer an initial assessment at a private dispenser when the dispenser is at least 95% as accurate as the ENT specialist, and prefer a follow-up visit at the ENT specialist.

摘要

目的

我们的目标是了解患者对于将助听器配置环节从医疗部门(耳鼻喉科专家和听力中心)转移至私人助听器经销商的偏好,并理解助听器配置不同环节之间的权衡取舍。

设计

对荷兰150名听力受损者进行了一项离散选择实验。平均年龄为71岁(范围18 - 95岁),男性占57%。

结果

参与者更倾向于在经销商处进行初始评估、在识别需要医疗护理的人员方面有更高的准确性、助听器配置总时长更短,以及由耳鼻喉科专家进行随访。他们要求每延长2个月额外时长至少补偿17欧元,在耳鼻喉科专家处进行初始评估补偿54欧元,准确性每降低10%补偿119欧元,放弃耳鼻喉科专家的随访补偿227欧元。偏好受到性别、年龄、教育水平以及助听器配置经验的影响。

结论

听力受损者愿意接受将助听器配置环节从医疗部门转移至私人经销商。尽管也应考虑安全和效率问题,但从本研究我们可以得出结论,在助听器配置的组织安排中,当经销商的准确性至少达到耳鼻喉科专家的95%时,听力受损者更倾向于在私人经销商处进行初始评估,并倾向于由耳鼻喉科专家进行随访。

相似文献

1
Patient preferences for direct hearing aid provision by a private dispenser. A discrete choice experiment.患者对私人助听器经销商直接提供助听器的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Ear Hear. 2008 Aug;29(4):557-64. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181734a19.
2
Potential barriers and facilitators for implementation of an integrated care pathway for hearing-impaired persons: an exploratory survey among patients and professionals.听力障碍者综合护理路径实施的潜在障碍与促进因素:一项针对患者和专业人员的探索性调查
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Apr 19;7:57. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-57.
3
Ear diseases and hearing in the Thai elderly population. Part I. A comparative study of the accuracy of diagnosis and treatment by general practitioners vs ENT specialists.泰国老年人群的耳部疾病与听力。第一部分。全科医生与耳鼻喉科专家诊断和治疗准确性的比较研究。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2002 May;85(5):521-31.
4
Willingness to accept versus willingness to pay in a discrete choice experiment.离散选择实验中的接受意愿与支付意愿
Value Health. 2008 Dec;11(7):1110-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00340.x. Epub 2008 May 16.
5
[Prescribing hearing aids in ENT practice. I. General principles of prescription and hearing aid technics].[耳鼻喉科临床中助听器的验配。I. 验配的一般原则及助听器技术]
HNO. 1987 Apr;35(4):149-56.
6
Quality improvement in action. Direct general practitioner referrals to audiology for the provision of hearing aids: a single centre review.实际中的质量改进。全科医生直接转诊至听力学部门以提供助听器:一项单中心回顾研究。
Qual Prim Care. 2010;18(3):201-6.
7
Hearing aid rehabilitation: what do older people want, and what does the audiogram tell?助听器康复:老年人想要什么,听力图又能说明什么?
Int J Audiol. 2003 Jul;42 Suppl 2:2S53-7.
8
Prospective evaluation of the value of direct referral hearing aid clinic in management of young patients with bilateral hearing loss.直接转诊助听器诊所对双侧听力损失年轻患者管理价值的前瞻性评估。
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004 Jun;29(3):206-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00804.x.
9
Hearing aid usage in occupational hearing loss claimants.职业性听力损失索赔者的助听器使用情况。
J Otolaryngol. 1990 Feb;19(1):25-30.
10
Hearing aids: value for money and health gain.助听器:性价比与健康效益
J Public Health Med. 1995 Dec;17(4):445-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Stated Preference Research in Otolaryngology: A Scoping Review.耳鼻喉科学中的陈述性偏好研究:一项范围综述。
OTO Open. 2025 Jun 12;9(2):e70140. doi: 10.1002/oto2.70140. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
2
Patient preferences for Remote cochlear implant management: A discrete choice experiment.患者对远程人工耳蜗管理的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 3;20(6):e0320421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320421. eCollection 2025.
3
Patient Experiences With Thyroid Nodules: A Qualitative Interview Survey.甲状腺结节患者的经历:一项定性访谈调查
OTO Open. 2023 Mar 8;7(1):e39. doi: 10.1002/oto2.39. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
4
The Fold-in, Fold-out Design for DCE Choice Tasks: Application to Burden of Disease.折叠式展开式设计在 DCE 选择任务中的应用:在疾病负担中的应用
Med Decis Making. 2019 May;39(4):450-460. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19849461. Epub 2019 May 29.
5
Factors involved in access and utilization of adult hearing healthcare: A systematic review.成人听力保健服务的获取与利用相关因素:一项系统综述。
Laryngoscope. 2017 May;127(5):1187-1194. doi: 10.1002/lary.26234. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
6
Patient preferences for hospital quality: case study of iran.患者对医院质量的偏好:伊朗的案例研究
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013 Sep;15(9):804-8. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.12851. Epub 2013 Sep 1.
7
The development of quality indicators in mental healthcare: a discrete choice experiment.精神卫生保健质量指标的制定:离散选择实验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2012 Aug 7;12:103. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-103.
8
Utility and importance of hearing-aid features assessed by hearing-aid acousticians.助听器声学专家评估的助听器功能的实用性和重要性。
Trends Amplif. 2010 Sep;14(3):155-63. doi: 10.1177/1084713810385713.
9
Factors influencing help seeking, hearing aid uptake, hearing aid use and satisfaction with hearing aids: a review of the literature.影响寻求帮助、助听器使用、助听器佩戴及对助听器满意度的因素:文献综述
Trends Amplif. 2010 Sep;14(3):127-54. doi: 10.1177/1084713810385712.