Suppr超能文献

孕激素疗法对皮质骨和小梁骨的影响:与雌激素的比较。

Effect of progestin therapy on cortical and trabecular bone: comparison with estrogen.

作者信息

Gallagher J C, Kable W T, Goldgar D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1991 Feb;90(2):171-8.

PMID:1847582
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of progestin therapy on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women and to compare its effects to those of estrogen.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A prospective, randomized clinical trial was performed in 81 postmenopausal women aged 51.7 +/- 4.4 years (mean +/- SD). They were assigned to one of four groups: Provera 20 mg, Premarin 0.6 mg, Premarin 0.3 mg plus Provera 10 mg, and a placebo. In addition, all women received calcium supplementation, if necessary, to a calcium intake of 1,000 mg/day. We used single- and dual-photon absorpiometry, metacarpal radiogrammetry, and computed axial tomography to measure bone mineral density in the total skeleton, spine, radius, and metacarpal.

RESULTS

Women receiving placebo lost bone at all sites (p less than 0.01). The Provera-treated group showed no change in total body calcium, but there were decreases in radial density (p less than 0.01), metacarpal cortex (p less than 0.01), and spine density (p less than 0.01). The Premarin-treated group had an increase in spine density and total body density (p less than 0.05), but a decrease in radial density (p less than 0.05). The Premarin-plus-Provera group showed no change in spine density, total body calcium, or radial density but had a decrease in metacarpal cortex (p less than 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to placebo, Provera reduced the rate of loss in cortical areas of the skeleton, but not in the spine, which contains more trabecular bone. In contrast, Premarin reduced the rate of loss in both cortical and trabecular areas of the skeleton. The low-dose combination of Premarin plus Provera was similar in its effect on bone to that of Premarin alone, suggesting that there may be a synergistic effect of this hormone combination on bone. Serum cholesterol levels decreased with Provera, Premarin, and the combination of both, whereas levels of serum triglycerides increased with Premarin treatment, decreased with the Provera regimen, and were unchanged with the combination therapy. Provera does not adversely affect the lipid profile.

摘要

目的

确定孕激素疗法对绝经后妇女骨矿物质密度的影响,并将其效果与雌激素的效果进行比较。

对象与方法

对81名年龄在51.7±4.4岁(均值±标准差)的绝经后妇女进行了一项前瞻性随机临床试验。她们被分为四组之一:安宫黄体酮20毫克组、倍美力0.6毫克组、倍美力0.3毫克加安宫黄体酮10毫克组以及安慰剂组。此外,所有妇女必要时补充钙,使钙摄入量达到每日1000毫克。我们使用单光子和双光子吸收法、掌骨X线测量法以及计算机轴向断层扫描来测量全身骨骼、脊柱、桡骨和掌骨的骨矿物质密度。

结果

接受安慰剂治疗的妇女所有部位的骨量均减少(p<0.01)。接受安宫黄体酮治疗的组全身钙含量无变化,但桡骨密度降低(p<0.01)、掌骨皮质降低(p<0.01)以及脊柱密度降低(p<0.01)。接受倍美力治疗的组脊柱密度和全身密度增加(p<0.05),但桡骨密度降低(p<0.05)。倍美力加安宫黄体酮组脊柱密度、全身钙含量或桡骨密度无变化,但掌骨皮质降低(p<0.01)。

结论

与安慰剂相比,安宫黄体酮降低了骨骼皮质区域的骨量丢失率,但对含有更多小梁骨的脊柱无效。相比之下,倍美力降低了骨骼皮质和小梁区域的骨量丢失率。倍美力加安宫黄体酮的低剂量组合对骨骼的作用与单独使用倍美力相似,表明这种激素组合可能对骨骼有协同作用。安宫黄体酮、倍美力以及两者组合均可使血清胆固醇水平降低,而血清甘油三酯水平在接受倍美力治疗时升高,接受安宫黄体酮治疗时降低,联合治疗时无变化。安宫黄体酮对血脂谱无不利影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验